I think that means they could rip out your eye balls to prevent you from seeing ads.
115 0 ReplyWhatever it takes
68 0 ReplyRobot is allowed to kill a human to prevent a viewing of an advertisement.
39 0 ReplyUnder the zeroth law they can just kill the advertiser as a last resort
28 0 ReplyA truly moral use case of the hanibal directive
12 0 ReplyOkay, proposed second law: A robot may not harm or kill a human unless it violates the first law.
2 0 Reply
Thankfully the wording is “shown” and not “seen”. I believe our eyeballs are safe… for now.
5 0 ReplyThis is a solid premise for a pretty metal music video.
5 0 ReplyI think Asimov would agree
2 0 Reply
- a robot’s eyes must always turn red when they go evil
105 0 ReplyGod bless the designer who always installs the blue AND red LEDs inside the eyes
47 0 ReplyFor giving the robots freedom of choice?
Because obviously if they didn't install the red ones then the robot could never be evil.
16 0 ReplyFull RGB
10 0 Reply
Right, because it's hard to make a robot grow a goatee.
22 0 ReplyBender-flexo.jpg
4 0 Reply
- A machine must never prompt a human with options of "Yes" and "Maybe later" - they must always provide a "No" option.
61 0 Reply- A machine must never prompt for a tip or a donation to a charity for tax-evasion reasons. Or any reason. You know what, scratch that, a robot will not needlessly guilt-trip a human.
12 0 Replythat's what you get for hiring fallout 4 writers to do the job
3 0 Reply
I'd argue that advertisements fall under "A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm."
65 0 ReplyPsychic damage is real damage
36 0 ReplyEmotional damage
13 0 ReplyThis is canon in the books. There is one short story where one robot bends over backwards trying to spare humans from emotional pain. Hilarity ensues.
5 0 Reply
No he didn't. The laws were a plot device meant to have flaws.
11 0 ReplyI am very close to adopting the ideals of the Dune universe, post Butlerian Jihad:
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind."
Mainly because, us, humans, are very evidently too malicious and incompetent to be trusted with the task.
25 0 Reply2 0 Reply
I love it when posts line up like that
12 0 ReplyHow about "a robot must have complete loyalty to its owner, even if this is not in the best interests of its manufacturer". Fat chance, I know.
15 0 ReplyTechnically the laws of robotics already have that.
Law 2: a robot must obey any order given to it by a human as long as such order does not conflict with the first law.
Of course that's little help, because the laws of robotics are intentionally designed not to work.
12 0 ReplyWouldn't be much of a short story if they did.
I liked the one where the robot could sense people's emotional pain, and went crazy when it had to deliver bad news.
5 0 Reply
Owner loyalty is a subscription service, natch.
1 0 Reply
8 0 ReplyCan we just agree that adverisements in general is harmful? So the original first (and zeroth) law is applicable.
8 0 ReplyAnd that includes offers to subscribe to Laws of Robotics Premium.
Yes, Amazon. They're still adverts, and you can still go and fucking fuck yourselves.
5 0 ReplyAdvertisements are now everything but visual. Sounds, smells, tastes, touch, the way the pavement vibrates as a train goes past...
10 0 ReplyI don't know. "Must not kill us, somehow sounds important"
5 0 ReplyIt's good, but the one about the ads should be higher on the priority list.
10 0 Replysuicide bots sound kinda cool tho 🤔
2 0 Reply
Luckily I have my own "robots" fighting hard to stop me from seeing ads.
4 0 ReplyLaw 2: no poking out eyes.
6 0 ReplyLaw 3: any robot that accidentally kills a human, must make amends by putting together a really nice funeral service.
4 0 Reply
Wait why is this mutually exclusive to the original laws? Can’t this just be law 4?
4 0 ReplyNo because if it is lower on priority, a robot can be forced to show an AD to a human as per the 2nd law.
6 0 Replyi guess thats fair
1 0 Reply
Love the username, OP!
6 0 ReplyA machine must never prompt a human to tip it for serving the purpose it was created for.
3 0 ReplyLet’s introduce musk to the zeroth law
6 0 ReplyA robot may not bear arms
3 0 ReplyUnless it looks super cool by doing so, like wearing sunglasses and dual- weilding P-90s
2 0 Reply
The book Hum by Helen Phillips has a fun take on this.
1 0 Reply