5mo ago

Fedora threatened with legal action from OBS Studio due to their Flatpak packaging

www.gamingonlinux.com

33 comments

I'm not surprised that the OBS devs are considering suing Fedora for their Fedora Flatpaks.
For anyone out of the loop:
Fedora's been packaging and providing apps as Fedora Flatpaks which cause users trouble cause they're honestly pretty shit and known to be unreliable. The issue is that users assume that these faulty packages are provided by the Original Devs and complain towards the ODevs.
As endless waves of users complain towards the ODevs it causes them unnecessary headache as well as costing valuable time and resources to tell users that it's actually Fedora fucking things for everyone.
All of this is unnecessary because if Fedora stopped installing Fedora Flatpaks as the default then there wouldn't be this problem in the first place.
- Thank you for the context. I've been kind of out of the loop with Linux on general and have been using fedora... But now a question. What's the most stable form of package and which distros use it by default? I've been kind of confused my the whole all image, flatpack, etc thing.
  
  Personally I'd recommend installing in this order:
  Packages from your distro's native repository.
  Flatpaks from Flathub (please avoid Fedora's Flatpaks).
  AppImages/Debs usually provided on the app developer's site.
  The Arch User Repository (AUR) if compatible.
  Tarballs.
  Ubuntu Snaps.
  Fedora Flatpaks.
  
  There isn't one. It's still a shit show.
  The most reliable way to distribute software on Linux is still to make a statically linked binary (linking with a very old glibc is fine) and use curl | bash. But that isn't always possible depending on the language used and the app.
  Seems like OBS Studio is C++/Qt, so it shouldn't be too difficult though. I've done it before in the distant past. But looking at their releases they only provide .deb for Linux, so I can understand why people would want something else.
- cause they're honestly pretty shit and known to be unreliable.
  Can you elaborate here? I've had very few issues with Flatpaks and the documentation is pretty thorough. I'm curious what wider issues it has to make the whole ecosystem "pretty shit" and unreliable.
  
  They have individual people maintaining over a thousand flatpacks. There's no time to test anything.
  Additionally, if you go to install the real flatpack, Fedora pushes you to use their poorly-maintained unofficial one instead.
Funny, I always thought it would be Canonical getting into this kind of trouble with snaps. Oh well...
- oh snap
Fair enough. If you’re going to repackage something, at least do it right.
I installed fedora to replace windows on the 31/12/2023. I wasn't a complete Linux noob by any measure but haven't run it as a main OS before. Thank you proton for getting me over the edge.
The whole repo situation on fedora is honestly pretty meh, things are out of date or broken too often. Or they just don't exist. I have put arch on a number of machines since and find it significantly better. My main box will move away from fedora next time I'm enthused to mess with it and this is the primary reason.
- Yikes... One would expect stability and reliability from main distros, it's funny to me that Linux Mint is the thing you recommend your family to try because Fedora and Ubuntu, formerly popular distros, went to shit.
  
  Fedora was always a bleeding-edge distro and never all that stable or reliable.
  The problem is RedHat/IBM have been fucking with everything, and Fedora has suffered along with everything else and it's just kinda decayed a bit over the past few years.
  ....Ubuntu went to shit at least a decade ago, if not longer.
Don't use flatpak. Its extremely insecure.
- Source?
  
  It doesn't have package signing. The source is their documentation.
Lmao, to think that not even the snap got sued but the fedora flatpal did...lol
Wow, Fedora is being a little bitch about it, aren’t they?
Debian debian, something debian.

33 comments