As someone who supports the carbon rebate and thinks it's a good policy, I have to admit that Carney is right. Trudeau screwed up the implementation, and now a policy that gives most Canadians more money than they pay is a third rail.
Replacing the tax with something more acceptable, and equally effective seems like a good way forward.
What we really need is something to make everyone else burn less fossil fuel that doesn't affect me personally in any way, because obviously I need to keep driving my SUV around the city. How else am I supposed to get the kids to soccer practice?
His proposal actually seems pretty good. At this point, just taking away Polievre's fucking slogan is a win. Plus, I really love the idea of working more on the international angle, great way to get a lot of countries on board especially while trump is lurching about screaming tarrifs. He can trade with Russia, North Korea and other climate change denialists while the civilized world works together.
And of course, keeping the existing rules on large companies is a nice touch.
I think the most reasonable complaint against direct carbon pricing is that people who are living in poverty can't afford to wait for the next rebate to come in.
It sounds like Carney is just proposing incentives (which seems kinda ineffective for consumers), which wouldn't have that drawback.
I live on about 16k a year. Plus all the rebates. Which total about 2-3k.
I don't drive. I don't buy gas. My utilities are part of rent. Besides, that i get a 140 rebate every few months which actually helps me. It's actually a nice little perk for a) not killing the life on this planet and destroying the climate. b) being poor.
The only thing I purchase that actually consumes / emits carbon are the 2 tanks of propane I use every year for my BBQ.
I definitely don't pay anywhere near the amount of carbon tax I receive in rebate.
My issue with the carbon tax has always been that consumers are not able to afford to make choices that reduce their consumption. For example, renters are unable to stop using gas heating. Most people cannot afford electric cars, or if they can, the infrastructure to actually charge it (house / garage).
Also, although it's obvious how much carbon tax I'm paying on my own gas bills, it's not clear to me how much food prices have gone up as a result of carbon tax on the transportation of that food.
I downvoted your comment because I think it is mostly factual incorrect. However, I don’t want to be too hard on you as it's also a good example of how the messaging around this policy was a complete failure.
For example, renters are unable to stop using gas heating.
I would guess a large percentage, maybe even the majority of rentals have electrical heat/heat included. And while individual renters can’t choose to switch their heating source at their current homes, making natural gas more expensive has a market effect, makes rentals with alternative heating sources more desirable.
Most people cannot afford electric cars, or if they can, the infrastructure to actually charge it (house / garage).
It’s not an all or nothing, the carbon tax encourages people to drive less. Whether they choose not to travel or go by walking, biking, carpool, public transit, consumers do have choices.
Also, although it’s obvious how much carbon tax I’m paying on my own gas bills, it’s not clear to me how much food prices have gone up as a result of carbon tax on the transportation of that food.
I agree, this definitely isn’t clear, and this is another failing in messaging. At very least, projections of these numbers should have been available right from the start. Instead, hearsay was allowed to thrive with many people believing inflation was due to the Carbon Tax. Recent studies have shown the effect on prices are almost insignificant.
Regardless of whether I can afford to make those choices, I'm not even given the opportunity to choose as I rent. My landlord isn't the one who will save on utilities or save money by having an EV. You could argue I could move to a more efficient rental, but prices have gone up so much since I moved here I could save 100% of all my energy costs and I'd still end up paying more.
So I agree in that the carbon tax can't change my usage, it only makes things less affordable.
As someone who supports the carbon rebate and thinks it's a good policy, I have to admit that Carney is right.
Regrettably true. At this point trying to convince people of the value of it is a losing battle. If Carney's plan is basically "Do climate incentives, but slightly differently so we can say we got rid of the Carbon Tax" I'd say that's a very savvy move.
If anything, this is exactly the kind of leader we need; someone who knows how to pick their battles, and how to achieve good progressive policy goals in ways that will get public support. I'm not a fan of the Liberals in general, I think their centrist corporatist politics are drowning us slowly, but God do I wish the NDP could learn to think like this.