If there is such a thing as a "male role" in our species, it is that of a protector and provider. That means you don't use your position of power to harm others unless it is to defend those who can't defend themselves and you don't use it to hoard more resources for yourself.
I sincerely hope this is true tbh. It has many benefits if it is...
It would be a good shift in the power dynamic of LGBT.
If he's a bottom then we could find him a loving and caring top to make sure he doesn't do anything else stupid.
If he's truly happy then maybe he'll stop acting so childish.
But alas I fear my dreams of our happy, billionaire twink will not come true.
Disclaimer: I'm mostly joking... Kinda... And I know he's not technically a twink, but I think he's mentally in his late teens so I think we should count it.
People doing Jiu Jitsu or MMA are rarely muscular, as that is detrimental to their performance. They want the most amount of strength and agility at the lowest possible bodyweight, so putting on unnecessary muscle would be a disadvantage. If you take a look at the highest ranking MMA fighters they are all at a pretty low bodyweight for their height
The average American man probably has more muscle than a world class MMA fighter, it's just hidden under a thick layer of bodyfat
Also hang on, now that there officially are no more men in the United states does this mean Zuckerberg wants more immigrants in his company? Or would they also count as female once they entered the american workforce‽
So in effect does he want to outsource even more of the company or does he secretly want more immigrants and is just not allowed to say it like that?
“I think a lot of the corporate world is pretty culturally neutered. Masculine energy is good, and obviously, society has plenty of that, but I think corporate culture was really trying to get away from it. I think having a culture that celebrates the aggression a bit more has its own merits that are really positive.”
This is the full quote. It's very hard to disagree with what he's saying, imo. If half your employees aren't acting the way they do in private, they're putting on a mask and not being their true selves
He's saying we need toxic masculinity in the work place because misogynists being punished have had their feelings hurt. He just wants a "boys will be boys" toxic work culture to fuel his lack of self worth and insecurity.
It's normal and very useful to reserve some types of behavior for the right occasions. You can let out your natural aggression while doing sports, just like you let out your sexual energy at home with your partner (or by yourself). No need to do everything at work, that would turn your work behavior toxic to your coworkers.
If half your employees aren't acting the way they do in private, they're putting on a mask and not being their true selves
But you're making this point in defense of someone aligning themselves with a group who targets trans, women, and whoever else they can bully not like them for being their true selves... Do you not see the hypocrisy of such a point given the context of the quote?
Tech bros behaving on the work floor like they do in private is why we have turned to a culturally neutered workplace. These men don’t know how to behave professionally around women.
You think celebrating aggressiveness in the workplace anywhere is good? IMO anyone who beats their partner or gets drunk and starts bar fights should be punished, not celebrated.