There are solo many things wrong in this weird conversation...

Except the last tweet, my dude was BASED.

14 comments

So the original tweet logically suggests that human men and woman are different species and that human babies are produce, a sellable raw material, perhaps edible.
- and that human babies are produce, a sellable raw material, perhaps edible.
  
  They are edible. It is just frowned upon.
  
  Prions would like a word with you.
- and that human babies are produce, a sellable raw material, perhaps edible.
  
  As both an atheist and a Jew, I can confirm this.
- Exactly. That's how they view humans, as "Consumables Products". And who "consume" and then "discard" humans lives? I have my guesses...
Not trying to be vulgar but the answer to her question is sperm.
- It looks like she couldn't come to that conclusion.
Why are people obsessed with the production level of a thing? Such weird fucking hierarchy minded motherfuckers out to weigh and judge every fucking thing.
- They have an "inflation fetish" related to numbers. They like seeing big numbers getting bigger. It reminds them to profit.
  
  "number go up" is a pretty nice thing to see
Mr Grumpy Arse with a avatar of Donald Trump holding a sign saying Starmer is a Wanker. Classy.

14 comments