To be honest, these kinds of posts are really annoying. I support trans rights and all of that, but the original post feels like it's just virtue signaling for upvotes. All of the "<character> says trans rights" posts are the same. If some find it affirming then that's great but it makes no sense to share in general communities where it doesn't contribute anything.
I can't tell if you didn't look at the tail or if you're just not as much of a Pokemon nerd as I am.
Oooh, took me a while to get tbh. I assumed this Pikachu was always a girl, but they gave her tail surgery. I think it would've been more obvious if I wasn't distracted by the giant fist.
Politics is when people have rights.
Yes, it is
The post isn't even just a trans flag, it actually has meaning. The tail has a little 'heart shaped thing' taped on it so that means the Pikachu in the photo is transfemme because female Pikachus have heart shaped tails
THATS SO CUTE AAAA 😭😭
Oh wow, neat. Appreciate your comment I had no idea.
That is very funny, great detail
"I deserve to exist"
"wow, why did you have to make things political"
A statement dreamt up by the utterly deranged.
Hey, leave my math memes alone.
At first, I thought the original original post was just arbitrarily using the Pokémon franchise to platform for transgender people, but the OP has modified a pre-fab model of a male Pikachu to turn it into a female Pikachu by adding the two bumps at the end of the tail. The gender dimorphism between Pikachu is fairly obscure knowledge so I can see why somebody might miss the point of that post.
I want to also note that this is something that actually happened in the show. There's a particular Pikachu (not Ash's) that shows up with a paper heart taped to their tail.
So, the show was already saying trans rights, this dumbass just didn't notice.
From what I can find, it seems like that may have been Ash’s Pikachu in disguise with a cross-dressing Ash to enter a women’s only organization. It’s possible that there was another instance but I’m not seeing it. This article and the Trivia section of this article may be informative about the history of changing gender expressions in the shows and games.
There's a particular Pikachu (not Ashs) that shows up with a paper heart taped to their tail.
that's so sweet 😭😭
Oh that's cool! Thanks for pointing that out.
Not trying to be offensive in any way but wouldn't the correct term be sexual dimorphism instead of gender dimorphism since sexual traits are more physical traits and gender is more soical?
I did consider using the term “sexual dimorphism” instead, but within the context of the post, “gender dimorphism” felt more correct. The biological sex and chromosomes of the pre-fab Pikachu model would stay the same, but its outward appearance and gender expression has changed to become feminine.
As a real life analogy, lion manes are an example of sexual dimorphism, but due to either hormonal abnormalities and/or a shortage of males, lionesses may grow manes and occupy the masculine role; a mane is sexually dimorphic for lions, but it becomes gender dimorphic for the lionesses who adopt the masculine role in their pride.
Also, as far as I’m aware, within Pokémon media and even within the programming code, they do use gendered terms but they never say the word “sex” specifically, so there is ambiguity within the fictional universe on top of the ambiguity of our own universe’s terminologies and schemata.
today i learned... Thank you!
Does anyone know how to name a female Pikachu?
Pikachu'ette?
Pikachu ♀
Simple as
Meanwhile...
one out of three female Azurill evolves into a male Marill
Sadly, this only happens in generations 3-5.
Azurill looks so much happier after evolving to Marill, so good for them.
This is a really niche interaction, so I find it funny when some Youtuber comes across it.
There is one trangender NPC in the main series of Pokémon games:
She's pretty explicitly trans in the Japanese version and heavily implied to be trans in the English version.
Sadly, the implication is removed in the Korean and German versions.Honestly, the fact that sexuality and gender are a political issue at all seems really silly when you break it down. Just let people fuck who they wanna fuck (with consenting adults, of course) and do what they want with their own body. If body mods like piercings and tattoos were this heavily regulated pretty much everyone would think it's the dumbest shit ever. You can get a tattoo and a piercing on your dick but if you wanna remove your dick entirely it's for some reason wrong? A woman can get breast implants but if anyone else does that's also wrong for some reason?
Edit: Wording.
This is because of the role religion plays in politics. Religion should have nothing to do with politics in modern times.
Religion is what gives these people the excuse.
It's their own prejudices that play into politics.
You must have your daily 2 minutes of hate, otherwise you might realize the people you hate are trying to give you healthcare and make groceries affordable.
'Legally' isn't the best choice of words here, IMO. I'm not saying we should be allowed to fuck minors (ew) but that the legal system has been used to opress and punish queer people. In some jurisdictions, it is legal to kill gay people. So using legality as your baseline is a bad idea.
Morality is I think what you're getting at. But then you get into the weeds of subjective morality and that's a mess...
Yeah that's totally fair. I only added it as an after thought because I feel like not adding something like that would have been worse. Maybe just "consenting adults" instead of "legally."
Just let people fuck who they wanna fuck (legally, of course)
I don't disagree with what you're saying I just want to play devils advocate a bit with this statement. It seems sort of odd to caveat a statement that appears unrestrictive with a restriction. I understand why you did it but you conceded the fact that there should be limits on who you can fuck within a statement that, when taken at face value, should mean you can fuck whoever you want. That seems a bit cumbersome doesn't it?
Yeah that makes sense. I mostly did it because if I didn't add that caveat I feel like it would have been worse. Maybe if instead I just said "consenting adults." Poor choices of words on my part.
The most concerning part is that the JustUnsubbed post has a positive number of votes. Reddit really has become more deranged than ever
Justunsubbed is mostly conservatives bitching about their hobbies moving left without them. I went through the list a few times to find subreddits I hadn't heard of, and found the communities they were bitching about to be universally less insufferable than the people at justunsubbed.
ok tbf it sounds like a subreddit that's just there for people to whine in
Pokemon is a non-political IP where checks notes the evil group usually torture pokemon, and oftentimes want to change the world to better reflect their ideal world.
Pokemon became political when checks notes again you treat people like people when they change THEIR body and don't expect anything more from you than before
As yes, makes sense. What is next? A Pokemon that can transform in other pokemon? A Pokemon that dresses up like a different kind pokemon? I bet the woke pokemon company will release a black Charizard that is more special as the original Charizard./s
Fuck morons. In a world, where everything is political, they manage to point at a 9yo girl wearing pants in a movie and claim that it is political.
Edit: THEY ARE LEAVING THEIR HOBBIES AND PASSIONS OVER THIS! THEY ARE LEAVING THEIR COMMUNITIES OVER THIS! that is mental.
And 269 upvotes WTF?
Please Trans Right ≠ Politics
If it makes you feel any better, /r/JustUnsubbed is just a right wing echo chamber. Most of the time people are “unsubbing” from subs that are simply friendly towards minorities.
Politics drives lawmaking. Ignore it if you want, but when laws are passed that make your life or society worse, what story will you tell yourself?
We all understand the frustration of politics. But it's still relevant.
that's a bit of a loaded response. Do you not consider fighting for your rights a political subject? note how i didn't comment on said rights.
There's a Pokemon episode where Pikachu tapes its tail into the heart shape to feign being a female Pikachu(was one of the handful of episodes where Ash cd'ed for something). Really just isn't political, trans pride colors and all.
I am saying this as someone who regularly looks at topics that are either very political or very heated or both and decides that I simply do not have the energy for discourse. Also how much of an asshole do you have to be to throw a fit over what would have likely been a very positive and wholesome thread prior to people trying to tear it down?
So often, "politics" just means "stuff I don't like." People don't think of "stuff I do like" as politics. And that's not a right-wing phenomenon. It's common across the political spectrum.
(This isn't me spouting "both sides" nonsense. The poster in that screenshot is a bigoted dumbass and a horrible human being. I'd have a lot more respect for someone quitting a Pokemon community that was rife with anti-LGBT bigotry even if the reason they gave was "it was too political". It's still frustrating to see the term "politics" (mis?)used in that way by people I otherwise respect, though.)
Everything's politics. "That's too political" is a copout non-statement. Have the guts to say what you mean.
Wait, so all of you unironically believe that a real human being posted this to Reddit just to show off, and then another real human being reposted it to a hate sub, and you all believe that these are independently acting humans are just being humans, on the human populated website Reddit?
Oh no oh no minority group fighting for equal rights and recognition with memes! Save yourselves while you can!!1
