NYT Panics Over Outrage at Insurance Companies
NYT Panics Over Outrage at Insurance Companies
The New York Times is in full-scale panic mode over the widespread boiling anger against the health insurance industry the killing of Brian Thompson has laid bare.
This one's a few days old, but I thought it was a good read.
[...] He dismissed the “idea that the American model of private insurance is uniquely evil and engaged in acts of social violence because it denies people too much treatment,” maintaining that all insurance systems, public or private, ration care.
But as I noted in the earlier FAIR article, the Commonwealth Fund (NBC, 9/19/24) found that the US system does, in fact, stand out among other peer nations, ranking “as the worst performer among 10 developed nations in critical areas of healthcare.” Those areas the US falls short in include “preventing deaths, access (mainly because of high cost) and guaranteeing quality treatment for everyone.” The rest of the world is doing better than us on these scores, contrary to Douthat.
Americans see the systems working in the rest of the world and know that the United States could have a better healthcare regime, but that corporate and government leaders simply choose not to.
Visit us @ !fediverse_vs_disinfo@lemmy.dbzer0.com for all the latest news on the topics of astroturfing, propaganda and disinformation.
Y'all cancelled NYT over their coverage of the People's approval of cancelling United Healthcare CEO's Life plan.
I cancelled NYT since they constantly peddled lies to get the US to attack Iraq in the 2000s.
And stopped giving AF with their overwhelmingly negative bias against trans people.
I cancelled my NYT sub and wrote, among many things, that Bret Stephens article was absolute bullshit.
On the feedback survey I received later asking if I'd come back, I repeated myself.
They offered a discount and I said fuck off.
I know it's probably whatever, but I guess part of me hopes someone actually reads them.
america's system doesn't cover everyone, and still costs twice as much per capita.
we could literally halve our overall health care expenditures as a nation, deny fewer services, treatments and drugs, and cover more people (everyone).
while that extra $2.4 trillion a year no longer spent on health care profits would be one helluva booster shot for the economy.
The US has the highest preventable death rate of any developed country. Those are deaths for which there is treatment but for whatever reason the treatment was not applied.
You can not square that with, "but every system rations care!" There's rationing and there's starvation diets.
It's not JUST rationing, either.
Some of it is the HMO stupid shit we've let ourselves be subject to.
As an example, I was hospitalized with heart failure. It was great: insurance paid for everything and it was all nicely taken care of.
Except, after leaving the hospital, I had some vision issues.
I had to go to my PCP, who sent me to an ophthalmologist, who sent me to an eye surgeon, who sent me to a neurologist, who sent me back to the ophthalmologist, who sent me back to the eye surgeon, who then referred me for imaging, and then scheduled and performed a surgery that fixed my shit.
This sounds like a victory for medical science, except for one itty bitty teeny weeny little problem: it took 17 months to do that.
Had this been something other than 'I went cross-eyed', and way more serious, then yes, the odds of dying in that time would probably be pretty damn high.
Yup and that entire scheme is meant to make people drop out and not get the surgery they need.
People close to me still talk about people coming to the United States for specialized care they can't get elsewhere, or in a timely manner. This "fact" seems to displace ANY criticism of the system. Every. Single. Time.
In Canada, the only people I've heard say that sort of thing are very wealthy and can pay out of pocket for preferential treatment in America, which their wealth can't buy them in Canada.
That "fact" is one of the problems with US health care system, not an endorsement of it. The US gives better, faster health care to the rich (even foreigners) by neglecting others.
Maybe you want to live in that kind of society. Not me.
Pretty weird that none of my English family has come to America to seek medical treatment. I wonder why they would chose an NHS hospital in Manchester instead of flying to Houston for Top Quality™️ care at the Medical Center there. Very interesting how the powers that be always want to compare our healthcare system to countries with GDP half of West Virginia instead of peer states like Germany, Japan, and the UK.
I hear ya. I don't know a lot of the figures. Just that that's what you hear people say (generally from people who have good insurance themselves mind you).
Try all they want, they’re not putting this cat back in the bag.
They will. They'll start saturating the news about immigrants eating cats, or about how liberals are trying to turn your kids into transvetites, or something to turn groups within the classes against each other... and it'll work. It has before. Remember Occupy Wall Street? It started out with conservative right wingers side-by-side with lesbian feminists, and it didn't take any effort at all before all of the infighting destroyed the movement. Since then, the blue collar vs liberal rhetoric has been amped up so much, fucking Trump got elected a second time.
This too shall pass, and at the end, you'll be paying premiums for no benefits because it'll be illegal to not to.
They mocked "Sheeple" until it was widely accepted as absurd, but Sheeple is the fundamental truth. Led as lambs to slaughter.
This is different. This is system is literally killing people. They’re not gonna be distracted by stupid shit this time. OWS people lost their houses not their lives. Healthcare people are losing their lives.
I remember OWS, I was a part of it. My mom gets all her news from liberal MSM tv news, and despite me physically being there she believed the false TV narrative over my own. I fucking hate the media. I’ve hated them since they manufactured consent post 9/11.
Immigrants eating cats would be cat out of bag, unless they ate the bag whole with the cat still in it.