Other than bullets raining over new jersey, I see no issues
Actually, there are no issues, this seems perfectly fine
more bullets than usual raining over New Jersey.
Switch to bird shot and only the normal amount of bullets will be raining down on New Jersey.
What if they switched to shooting sand? Raining sand isn't too deadly, it's not dense enough right? And if it's not lethal enough to the drones, then they can just up the caliber to shoot more sand.
The EMF noise created by brushlessmotors used by drones can probably be triangulated by some NRO satellite constellation.
Just 155 airburst the coordinates, if no other agency claims the drones as property.
how dare you say bad things to the best of the best: F-22 never missed, it did it on purpose to trick chinese balloons into thinking F-22 are bad! Now china can send their GDP worth of balloon over USA and F-22 will shoot all of them, burning all of chinese economy into dust: BEST, PLAN, EVER!
shoot first and ask questions later
...
will not be taking any questions
Logical conclusion is to shoot first, full stop. Questions reduce morale and efficiency anyway.
Consider this my application for the Civil Air Patrol drone defence division.
Given the number of telescope and hyperzoom enthusiasts, I'm surprised we don't have have some good pictures of these drones.
I'm waiting for the infowars-wagons to install cope-cages.
Other than bullets raining over new jersey, I see no issues
Actually, there are no issues, this seems perfectly fine
more bullets than usual raining over New Jersey.
Switch to bird shot and only the normal amount of bullets will be raining down on New Jersey.
What if they switched to shooting sand? Raining sand isn't too deadly, it's not dense enough right? And if it's not lethal enough to the drones, then they can just up the caliber to shoot more sand.