10 years ago, this judge ruled NYPD was wrong on stop-and-frisk. Now she worries it's coming back.
10 years ago, this judge ruled NYPD was wrong on stop-and-frisk. Now she worries it's coming back.
gothamist.com 10 years ago, she ruled the NYPD was wrong on stop-and-frisk. Now she worries it's coming back.
Now retired from the federal bench, Shira Scheindlin says the controversial policing tool was wrong then and still ineffective.
![10 years ago, she ruled the NYPD was wrong on stop-and-frisk. Now she worries it's coming back.](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/64fa1b3c-03cd-4de1-8477-b427b860248a.webp?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
4
comments
Unless you can afford a lawyer, Stop and frisk is the norm.
3 0 ReplyIf they can't provide a RAS, then it is unconstitutional.
They can try to make one up, but that's where the body cameras are supposed to help.
2 0 ReplyI don't disagree that you're right and it's unconstitutional, but in actual day-to-day law enforcement, the constitution is pretty far in the background.
1 0 ReplyYa that's not how it works lol.
1 0 Reply