c/cfb Week 8 Poll
c/cfb Week 8 Poll
We are beginning to approach the first cfp rankings. If you're interested in the cfp prize, be sure to submit some ballots!
c/cfb Week 8 Poll
We are beginning to approach the first cfp rankings. If you're interested in the cfp prize, be sure to submit some ballots!
Here's my ballot, as always my methodology is fuck you I do what I want
Last 2 spots aren't SEC bias, no siree
My ballot. Computer poll. Glad to see it's giving props to Army, which was preseason #105. The way the algorithm is designed and the way a lot of G5 teams' schedules are structured, it's hard for G5 teams to get ranked (e.g. it still has Boise unranked, sitting at #35).
I'm also amused by some of the big swings over the course of the season: Wisconsin is this week's biggest mover (+40 spots) and looking back the computer had them at 14th in Week 1, all the way down to 118th in Week 4, and now back up to 33rd.
::: spoiler Full ranking: | Rank | Change | Team | Record | Points | | ---: | :---: | :--- | :--- | :--- | | 1 | - | Texas | 6-0 | 479 | | 2 | - | Ohio State | 5-1 | 425 | | 3 | - | Ole Miss | 5-2 | 419 | | 4 | +5 | Notre Dame | 5-1 | 413 | | 5 | -1 | Alabama | 5-1 | 408 | | 6 | +7 | Clemson | 5-1 | 394 | | 7 | +1 | Penn State | 6-0 | 380 | | 8 | +5 | Tennessee | 5-1 | 361 | | 9 | +9 | Georgia Tech | 5-2 | 353 | | 10 | -5 | Indiana | 6-0 | 352 | | 11 | +4 | USC | 3-3 | 350 | | T12 | +22 | Oregon | 6-0 | 348 | | T12 | +10 | Iowa State | 6-0 | 348 | | 14 | +13 | BYU | 6-0 | 347 | | 15 | -9 | Miami (FL) | 6-0 | 342 | | 16 | +8 | Georgia | 5-1 | 338 | | 17 | +9 | Minnesota | 4-3 | 334 | | T18 | +13 | Army | 6-0 | 331 | | T18 | +13 | Arizona State | 5-1 | 331 | | 20 | -3 | Washington | 4-3 | 329 | | 21 | -14 | Texas A&M | 5-1 | 326 | | 22 | +13 | JMU | 5-1 | 322 | | 23 | -14 | Virginia Tech | 3-3 | 321 | | 24 | +1 | Kentucky | 3-3 | 320 | | 25 | +8 | UNLV | 5-1 | 318 | | 26 | +12 | Vanderbilt | 4-2 | 316 | | 27 | -16 | SMU | 5-1 | 314 | | T28 | +17 | LSU | 5-1 | 309 | | T28 | -16 | Nebraska | 5-1 | 309 | | T28 | +7 | South Carolina | 3-3 | 309 | | 31 | -15 | Arkansas | 4-2 | 302 | | 32 | +8 | Pittsburgh | 6-0 | 300 | | 33 | +40 | Wisconsin | 4-2 | 298 | | 34 | +9 | Cincinnati | 4-2 | 297 | | 35 | +12 | Boise State | 5-1 | 294 | | T36 | -7 | Oklahoma | 4-2 | 291 | | T36 | -17 | Tulane | 4-2 | 291 | | 38 | +30 | Missouri | 5-1 | 290 | | T39 | -19 | Michigan | 4-2 | 288 | | T39 | +14 | Louisville | 4-2 | 288 | | T39 | +36 | Northwestern | 3-3 | 288 | | 42 | +20 | Texas State | 4-2 | 287 | | T43 | +14 | Kansas State | 5-1 | 286 | | T43 | -22 | Boston College | 4-2 | 286 | | T43 | +24 | Jacksonville State | 3-3 | 286 | | T46 | -24 | Sam Houston | 5-1 | 282 | | T46 | +7 | Northern Illinois | 4-2 | 282 | | T46 | +28 | Iowa | 4-2 | 282 | | 49 | +14 | Syracuse | 5-1 | 281 | | 50 | +8 | Illinois | 5-1 | 279 | | 51 | - | Colorado | 4-2 | 278 | | T52 | -1 | Utah | 4-2 | 277 | | T52 | -5 | North Carolina | 3-4 | 277 | | T54 | -26 | Texas Tech | 5-1 | 272 | | T54 | +9 | California | 3-3 | 272 | | 56 | +13 | Memphis | 5-1 | 270 | | 57 | -27 | Duke | 5-1 | 267 | | 58 | +8 | Virginia | 4-2 | 261 | | 59 | +12 | Louisiana | 5-1 | 259 | | T60 | -25 | Connecticut | 4-2 | 257 | | T60 | +5 | West Virginia | 3-3 | 257 | | T62 | -3 | Toledo | 4-2 | 256 | | T62 | -2 | Arizona | 3-3 | 256 | | T64 | -11 | Maryland | 3-3 | 253 | | T64 | +12 | Florida | 3-3 | 253 | | 66 | +11 | Washington State | 5-1 | 252 | | 67 | -28 | TCU | 3-3 | 251 | | 68 | +22 | Miami (OH) | 2-4 | 247 | | 69 | +9 | Nevada | 3-4 | 246 | | 70 | -17 | Rutgers | 4-2 | 245 | | 71 | -30 | Navy | 5-0 | 243 | | 72 | +9 | UCF | 3-3 | 241 | | 73 | -31 | Houston | 2-4 | 240 | | 74 | +11 | UNT | 5-1 | 239 | | 75 | +11 | Old Dominion | 2-4 | 238 | | 76 | -33 | Oklahoma State | 3-3 | 237 | | 77 | -32 | Baylor | 2-4 | 236 | | T78 | +1 | San Jose State | 4-2 | 235 | | T78 | +14 | Western Kentucky | 4-2 | 235 | | T80 | -33 | Oregon State | 4-2 | 234 | | T80 | +4 | Kansas | 1-5 | 234 | | 82 | -32 | Auburn | 2-4 | 233 | | 83 | +5 | NC State | 3-4 | 229 | | 84 | -24 | Florida State | 1-5 | 224 | | 85 | +2 | Bowling Green | 2-4 | 220 | | 86 | -7 | Coastal Carolina | 4-2 | 216 | | T87 | +13 | UL Monroe | 5-1 | 215 | | T87 | -5 | Eastern Michigan | 4-2 | 215 | | 89 | +2 | Fresno State | 3-3 | 213 | | 90 | -21 | Michigan State | 3-3 | 212 | | T91 | -20 | South Alabama | 2-4 | 211 | | T91 | +1 | FIU | 2-4 | 211 | | 93 | +4 | UCLA | 1-5 | 209 | | 94 | +2 | Marshall | 3-3 | 208 | | 95 | +2 | Ohio | 4-2 | 207 | | 96 | +6 | Liberty | 5-0 | 205 | | 97 | +8 | Buffalo | 4-2 | 204 | | 98 | +9 | San Diego State | 3-3 | 197 | | 99 | +4 | Georgia Southern | 4-2 | 196 | | 100 | -17 | ECU | 3-3 | 195 | | 101 | +11 | New Mexico | 2-4 | 191 | | 102 | +3 | FAU | 2-4 | 189 | | 103 | +5 | Mississippi State | 1-5 | 188 | | T104 | -16 | Charlotte | 3-3 | 186 | | T104 | -10 | Wake Forest | 2-4 | 186 | | T106 | +7 | Western Michigan | 3-3 | 185 | | T106 | +12 | Louisiana Tech | 2-3 | 185 | | 108 | +1 | Central Michigan | 3-3 | 181 | | T109 | -10 | Colorado State | 3-3 | 174 | | T109 | +7 | Stanford | 2-4 | 174 | | 111 | +5 | Rice | 2-4 | 170 | | 112 | -17 | Troy | 1-5 | 168 | | 113 | -2 | Hawaii | 2-4 | 164 | | 114 | -11 | Massachusetts | 1-6 | 163 | | 115 | -15 | Temple | 1-5 | 161 | | 116 | -7 | Arkansas State | 3-3 | 160 | | 117 | -2 | USF | 2-4 | 158 | | 118 | +4 | UTSA | 2-4 | 155 | | 119 | - | Wyoming | 1-5 | 154 | | 120 | +1 | Georgia State | 2-3 | 150 | | 121 | -2 | Air Force | 1-5 | 148 | | 122 | +2 | Akron | 1-6 | 145 | | 123 | +2 | Appalachian State | 2-4 | 140 | | 124 | +6 | Ball State | 2-4 | 139 | | 125 | +7 | Purdue | 1-5 | 138 | | 126 | -4 | UTEP | 0-6 | 135 | | 127 | -13 | Tulsa | 2-4 | 134 | | 128 | -1 | Southern Mississippi | 1-5 | 129 | | 129 | - | Utah State | 1-5 | 124 | | 130 | -3 | UAB | 1-5 | 116 | | 131 | -6 | New Mexico State | 1-5 | 115 | | 132 | +1 | Middle Tennessee | 1-5 | 102 | | 133 | +1 | Kent State | 0-6 | 99 | | 134 | -3 | Kennesaw State | 0-5 | 92 |
Here is my ballot from my computer poll:
Guess what - I'm back and this week I'm just going to submit my awful computer poll in its completeness because where is the fun in being rational.
I've modified the methodology slightly, but it's still incredibly rudimentary and it hates two loss teams which is good because I hate them too. It still really favors teams that haven't lost, but I've added some SOS and Conference Strength weight, so it kind of keeps teams in check but not really.
Some fun facts: -It rates the SEC highest of all conferences (I have each conference start out level and it adjusts their strength based on out-of-conference performance; I haven't actually looked at these records so I can't speak to the validity of it). Followed by: Big Ten, ACC, Big 12, Pac-12 (congrats OSU and WSU for keeping it above the Group of 5 conferences). -It thinks that Florida State has had the more difficult schedule up to this point and that Army has had the softest.
Finally someone comes out and says it, ULM is better than Tennessee!
Hey everyone! Sorry for being silent the first half of this season...real life got in the way of football polling. But I'm back, and I've made some changes to my algorithm from last year. The overview/highlights:
Welcome back! Hopefully things are going alright now. If you missed it, we're running a cfp seeding contest this season to try and boost engagement a little as well.
Human poll. Quick overview. I try to make the poll a blind resume, as in I don't care about head to head. I prefer consistency over peaks (2 wins over a mid program will rank higher than a win against a top and a loss to a bottom. ). 3. If you are 5-0 or better, you get an auto ranking.
Just for fun, because the end was really hard, here are my next 5 out, not in any particular order
Illinois, Syracuse, Texas Tech, UNLV, Washington State
This was a fun week to try and solve. I don't love a bunch of my placements, but it sure is fun.