moneymoneymoneymoneymoneymoneymoney moneymoneymoneymoneymoneymoneymoney moneymoneymoneymoneymoneymoneymoney moneymoneymoneymoneymoneymoneymoney
54 0 ReplyError: undefined reference 'money'
21 0 Reply
"I'm writing a recursive method with threads to optimize the CPU usage in a 0.02%" THIS IS A NONSENSICAL STATEMENT MADE BY DERANGED PEOPLE
I mean this is correct though
52 0 ReplyRecursion makes it cheaper to run in the dev's mind, but more expensive to run on the computer. Subroutines are always slower than a simple jump.
16 0 ReplyRecursion makes it cheaper to run in the dev's mind, but more expensive to run on the computer.
Maybe for a Haskell programmer, divide-and-conquer algorithms, or walking trees. But for everything else, I'm skeptical of it being easier to understand than a stack data structure and a loop.
7 0 ReplyDynamic programming: Heyyy...
4 0 Reply
Yeah, you have to be pretty deranged to mix multithreading and recursion together.
7 0 Reply
while (true) { print money; }
Someone’s never heard of Bitcoin
36 0 ReplyOptimizing CPU usage by 0.02% is something only the truly deranged do
18 0 ReplyI saw an article last week about a one-liner they were adding to the Linux kernel that would reduce the startup time by .03 seconds, and let me tell you, I was relieved.
13 0 ReplyNot necessarily. It depends on what you're optimizing, the impact of the optimizations, the code complexity tradeoffs, and what your goal is.
Optimizing many tiny pieces of a compiler by 0.02% each? It adds up.
Optimizing a function called in an O(n2) algorithm by 0.02%? That will be a lot more beneficial than optimizing a function called only once.
Optimizing some high-level function by dropping into hand-written assembly? No. Just no.
11 0 Reply0.02% means you’re saving a fraction of a second for every hour of runtime. A lot of adding up is required to make it significant enough for anyone to notice.
Better to spend that time and effort on things that actually bring value. These kind of micro optimizations can also make the code unnecessarily complicated and difficult to work with, which is a hindrance for the optimizations that truly matter.
5 0 Reply
#gentoo
3 0 Reply
This is a butchered rip off of an actual joke.
16 0 ReplyI mean, that's what a meme template is, yes.
42 0 Reply-
this isn't an image macro / meme template
-
this isn't how the humor of a meme template works. This is the same joke, worse. This is just stealing a joke.
1 0 Reply-
I'm a senior dev and I'll be honest: I'm not sure what I do.
15 0 ReplyYou enchant rocks engraved with runes
26 0 ReplyComputer programmers are the wizards of the present.
7 0 Reply
I take offense to the teapot joke. Leave the teapots out of it.
9 0 ReplyTell that to Don Norman.
3 0 Reply
The angle between my chin and my lip corner has increased. Thank you.
7 0 ReplyJokes on you, the Fed has been running that bottom program for years.
7 0 ReplyI think I had enough Internet for today.
5 0 ReplyWhat scares me, is that this can really not be a joke
5 0 ReplyExcept the teapot. The teapot is highly valuable.
3 0 Reply
What's the teapot a reference to?
4 0 ReplyI was aware of status code 418. The whole thing being a huge April Fools joke is amazing.
5 0 Reply
It's an in-joke in 3D modeling: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_teapot
11 0 Reply2 0 Reply
OK. I guess it's time to go start my rutabaga farm now.
4 0 ReplyI can't not read this in Ron Swanson's voice.
3 0 ReplyBut we had to program the computer for it to be able to do math in the first place?
3 0 ReplyWhy is it that 5 minutes before bed time when I'm really tired do I have the urge to fire up a C tutorial?
2 0 Reply