That a non-offensive version of asking "whose the man" to a lesbian couple.
The answer is "neither", and you look dumb for asking.Wow. That is a harsh take. But true.
The peanut butter, with it's thicker texture and protein is obviously the meat, and the jelly, with it's more liquidy texture and lack of nutrition is the condiment
I second this.
I'd eat a peanut butter sandwich without the jelly, but I don't think I'd ever eat just a jelly sandwich.
Similar question for cheese and ketchup, you'd be more likely to eat a cheese sandwich without ketchup than a ketchup sandwich without cheese
Jelly sandwiches are actually pretty solid... have you ever had jam on toast?
You do you, but ketchup on a grilled cheese sounds nasty. Ketchup is a C tier condiment at best.
Meat is not a requirement in a sandwich
Counterpoint: Animal flesh is not a requirement to be called "meat".
The peanut butter and jelly is the meat with the bread as a condiment
Chaotic neutral, you love to see it
"Nut meat" is a common phrase so I would guess the peanut product is closest, but please stop this line of thought for your own safety.
Does a sandwich have to have meat?
The PB and J are both fillings, or toppings for the case of an open sandwich.
Is this like the popcorn bucket thing? If my peanut butter and jelly sandwich contains your meat I don't want it.
"Filling" is the word you're looking for, not "meat".
