I mean, for all intents and purposes, they kinda are. They’re both pictures of artists making a political statement with their art.
Certainly, but one art is of a severed head, and the other makes use of a mask. They are not the same, in the way so many in Cult 45 want to equivocate them.
Edit: So I guess, to one or two intents and purposes (art/political speech), they're the same. To the rest, not so much.
They’re actually both Trump masks, just one is covered in ketchup. Griffin has talked about the whole thing a lot, since it essentially ruined her career.
I think situational common sense is critical here. We’re talking about a comedian expressing herself in a way that some people might consider offensive. That’s pretty much her job description, and she’s great at it. Knowing her and her work makes these two pictures essentially the same.
Absolutely. Both are well within their rights of freedom of speech and expression. I like em both more because of it. I mean, I already liked them for their work.
To hear the stories Kathy tells about the death threats after this image are pretty crazy.
Who cares if they were?
What, no GWAR?!
What did I miss?
So basically both blown out of proportion.
By people who are the target customer for this 》》
Yeah, people like Green Day.
Kathy Griffin was washed up well before the top picture was taken.
OOTL
They are different. True. So?
