I've been a professional programmer for nearly a decade and I just realized that C# is C++++ with the pluses stacked
167 0 ReplyI know right‽ feels like when I learnt about the FedEx arrow for the first time
75 0 Replyo shit
4 0 Reply
I'm glad I wasn't the only uncultured swine unaware of the ++++ = #
19 0 ReplyYes, and that is on purpose! It was always meant to be a joke on C++ :)
17 0 ReplyMe too - maybe because I was distracted by the irony that C# devs are typically the opposite of sharp... Or because it's MicroShit and I didn't give a flippin fuck ;)
8 0 ReplyCringy
25 0 ReplyDon't cut yourself on that edge kiddo
18 0 Reply
- TIL.
6 0 Reply
93 0 Reply78 0 ReplyChange is hard.
18 0 Reply
67 0 ReplyIt's not that bad, besides who cares with machines being as fast as they are nowadays?
2 0 Reply
I once saw an issue someone made for some database and said that they were learning Rust and if the database was rewritten in Rust then they could help contribute!
5 0 Reply
TessaraCt
44 0 ReplyTesseraC+
28 0 ReplyC Tesseract has this interstellar vibe and brings quotes like the following, but with a totally different meaning:
- "Years of [compilation error] messages"
- "People disn't build this Tesseract"; "Not yet... But one day. Not you and me but people, people who've evolved beyond the four dimensions we know"
- "You've got to leave something behind"
8 0 ReplyI'm waiting for the marvel cinematic universe movie about filling out TPS reports and preparing for Y2k... it's guaranteed to do better than Black Adam.
3 0 ReplyWasn't that the Loki show, where all of time is run by a boring dystopian corporate bureaucracy?
Now that I think of it, I guess you're right, that show probably did do better than Black Adam.
4 0 Reply
That's a HyperCube.
2 0 ReplyT-C-ract
1 0 Reply
Where C♭
25 0 Reply- C
- C plus plus
- C plus plus plus plus
- C plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus
- C plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus plus
24 0 ReplyC₊𝅄⨧⁺ᐩ is used for building firmware for hyperdimensional singularity processors.
20 0 ReplyHow did you insert those unicodes????
4 0 ReplyGo here and Ctrl-C / Ctrl-V
I especially like ⨹
6 0 ReplyH̢̱̀e͖ͧ͘r͈̔́e̖̅̀ͅ ḩ͒͏̩̲ẹ̽ͯ̀ c̔͑͠҉̬o̢̢̠̜̓̚m̷̻̳ͧͪ͘ę̢̥̋̀s̢͈̲ͧ̀͜ͅ,̧̔͞ͅ f͖͗̿̕͝ȅ̴̶̩̂͟a̸̡̯͈̼͋͡s̗̋̀̀̀̀͟t̒̾͏̯ y̸̛̟̽̇o̢̟̜͂͆ͯ͘͜u̧̧̜͔͇ͭͫ́̚͞r̀̃͑̓͒͏̮ e̍̒̇ͯ҉̴̲̭y̷̰̖ͨ̑͜e̓ͭͭ͂̕҉̸̛̦̱̤̫͢s̡̛̫͋̕ o̢͉̘͚̤̅ͫͤ̓ͭ̕͡n͊͘҉̲̟̖͔͝͞ t̷̟͊̽h̨̦͎̅̄ͪ́̚͘͠i̶̢̛̬̞̦͊̅̏̀́s̶̸̢̹̹͕̩̜̣̎ͫͤ͐̈̀.̛̰̼̗̺̼͗ͣ̏́̚͟͠.̵̪ͥ̈̚̚͞ͅ.̷̶͎̞̳̘̈͋ͬ̈͂͒͠ z̸̛̫̓͜͟͡ḁ̧ͨ͊͗ͫͫ̅́͢͠͠l̵̴͒͏͚̥̻g̩͎̲̼̠̿̅ͩ͌̇͟o̢̝͍͔͍̼̼ͤͦ̎́͘͝ i̷ͧ̅̂͟͡͠͞҉̸̙̱͍͈̝̠̺̀ͅs̗̮͇̪̯̋͋́̕ t̵̶̛̰̘̰̫̬͖̜͗̒͗̉̿͌̀̀͢ẖ̴̴̡̭̪̉̌̈́͗͘e̵ͬ̃ͬ͌͆̍͏̧̡̧̦̘͇͕͙̳̹͜ ạ̳̺͎̤̺̖̠̔̈ͮ̉̌̓̀́͟͢͞͞n̊͏̰̖̘̖̭̰̖̕͢ş̴̽͘҉̮̞̼̱w̨̢̠̻͐̐͑̊͢͞e̢̡̛͖̙̟̣͋͆͘̕ͅŗ̧̯ͪ͘͘͜͡.̭̘͇͓̹̻̖̖͉͊ͪ́
2 0 ReplyOn PC, you can hold Alt and press a number combination, like 1 or 257, to get an ASCII smiley. Not Unicode, but hey, it's something
1 0 Reply
This isn't the evolution of C at all. It's all just one language and you're simply stuck in a lower dimension with a dimensionally compatible cross-section.
18 0 ReplyNix
I'm starting to have my suspicions
17 0 ReplyI'm not ready for 4D, just let me try out C Lattice on a few smaller projects first.
15 0 Replyalways wanted to C in the 4th dimension
14 0 Reply"works on my machine."
9 0 Reply"Just a heads up that we'll be shipping your machine to the client, since it's the only machine on Earth known to support the software. You're getting the spare machine out of the basement. Super fast Cyrix processor. Looks like it boots to Windows 11 release 3, but they've written it 3.11 for some reason."
22 0 ReplyLol I had windows 11 before it was cool
4 0 ReplyI wonder if I could upgrade it to Windows 95 and run X-Wing vs. TIE Fighter on it.
2 0 Reply
Closes ticket, marks Git issue as closed
2 0 Reply
I really like the theory that the Carbon language is that 3-dimension one—a carbon lattice
7 0 ReplyC
C plus
C plus plus
C sharp
C sharp sharp
C through time and space
Edit: formatting
7 0 ReplyThe last one needs the prongs sticking out to make it a hyperhashtag.
4 0 ReplyC ube?
3 0 ReplyCnD where n represents any dimension.
1 0 ReplyCypercube
1 0 Reply