Google Gemini ad controversy: Where should we draw the line between AI and human involvement in content creation?
Google Gemini ad controversy: Where should we draw the line between AI and human involvement in content creation?
Google’s recent ad controversy brings up key questions about the preservation of human skills, and the ethical and social implications of integrating generative AI tools into everyday tasks.
I think LLM's are incredibly useful in limited circumstances. But it needs to be on-demand, NOT omnipresent.
For example, I'm learning a bit of C#. I was following a tutorial a few weeks ago that had some code I didn't understand. I spent an hour googling and reading documentation, but found nothing. I headed to ChatGPT and asked it what it meant. It gave a clear, easy to understand explanation.
Unfortunately, the industry is going about this all wrong. Google wants to force Gemini on my Pixel. So I nuked Android. Microsoft silently installed Copilot on my laptop without consent. That laptop is now happily running Linux.
Forcing these tools on people will just alienate people like me. In a way, I'm glad it happened. I'm much more satisfied now that these companies are minimized in my life.
Google wants to force Gemini on my Pixel. So I nuked Android.
And what do you use now?
I installed Graphene OS. Loving it so far.
The line is drawn where these companies don't make money