They look like crap, I won't watch them.
Same and I have pretty much have no opinion outside of that.
I’d rather wait, or pay to see it in a theatre. Every time.
Yeah, I've got this dilemma with Deadpool. Broke af but really want to see it.
I'd rather wait for at least a 1080 webrip than to suffer through the cruddy audio and visuals of a cam. Heck, I don't even like going to the theatre, why would I pretend to do that in 480p with early 2000's cellphone audio?
If I want to see a movie so badly, I'd rather go to the cinema rather than watch a low-quality camrip.
All of them have really bad audio and as such, they're completely useless.
Even TS releases?
The audio of a TS is captured with a direct connection to the sound source (often an FM microbroadcast provided for the hearing-impaired, or from a drive-in theater).
TS releases do have good audio. Cams in general have a lot of visual problems though; poor color accuracy, warping, incomplete frames, sometimes people moving around, things like that. Also pretty much every cam I've seen lately has been covered in ads for sketchy gambling sites throughout the entire runtime. None of this makes for a good viewing experience.
Also, I don't think I've ever seen a cam with subtitles available.
Eh, I'll wait for a better version.
I cannot fathom why anyone would want to subject themselves to such utter horror.
Patience is a virtue
Reminds me of the good ol' days in the 90s. Watching cam recordings and people standing up or taking loudly the entire movie.
Haven't watched a cam recording in decades. Don't plan on doing that again.
I ended up using a cam for a movie from 2009 to check to see if the movie had differences between the theater version and the DVD release. It didn't but it was neat that I could, 15 years later.
So I respect it, but also, good god will I never actually watch them for the actual movie itself.
😮never thought about the archive function of CAM releases
Like it doesn't exist for me. Same for MD
Not worth the storage space. I'll wait for digital/physical release.
No thanks
Back in the early days, watching a cammed movie was tolerable because the 480p rips that we'd otherwise get were so heavily compressed that there'd be hardly any step up in quality. It was also usually the fastest way I could find a new movie.
These days, releases get leaked from inside the studio all the time, at full quality, so there's not really any legitimate need for cammed movies anymore.
I would not say "all the time" at least the movies I watch, but it is mostly only some months (if even) until a movie is available on some streaming service and gets ripped in 4k
Well, its the thought that counts I guess
Telesync, maybe
Usually I hate them, but there's this deadpool vs wolverine cam edited on my private tracker. It has blown me away. I swear if I didnt know it was a cam I wouldn't have guessed
Don't listen to this weed smoking wanker. Their copy is half French and half sign language in Korean.
Isnt that how all movies are deafblindFrenchKoreantorrents.ru tells me thats all there is
Given that some films are getting post-release edits before they appear on streaming or physical media, it might be a good idea just from an archival perspective.
I'm not a good judge of piracy methods for consumption, as I am currently willing to pay their prices or do without.
I have watched them but usually I wait for HD.
What do I think of cams?
RIP DVDSCR's
I feel bad because someone paid for a ticket and sat there filming for 90 minutes but I can't stand them.
Yeah bad way to enjoy the film...
The turnaround from screen to home media has gotten short enough to where it’s fine to wait for a high quality version. Cams were good in the 80s when you bought the VHS tapes from some dude selling them out of a box down in the subway. Though the odds of brining home a blank were pretty good!
