Kamala Harris’ call for ‘reproductive freedom’ means restoring Roe

you fucking morons

You don't need to restore Roe.

You need an actual law enshrining it as a right.

I'm not a judge, but I can definitely see why Roe was overturned. So don't play stupid games, don't rely on a Court to interpret a certain Law a certain way, just enshrine it in law. Black ink on white paper.

Oh of course, we'll just go ahead and do that tomorrow! Sheesh, what were we thinking? Thank you so much for your enlightening remarks. It was so obvious this entire time!

Politico Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [**High**] (Click to view Full Report)

Politico is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/politico/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News:
- https://ground.news/find?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2F2024%2F07%2F29%2Fkamala-harris-abortion-restoring-roe-00171657

Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

Rather just restore, improve. It was said Roe is incomplete and should be revisited for better and clearer coverage.

How would "restoring" work? Is that legislation, or modifying the supreme court, etc?

Basically legislation. Dobbs just said there wasn’t a constitutional right, but that doesn’t mean there can’t be a federal law that makes that a right. A federal law could effectively restore this right (although it wouldn’t make it a constitutional right, which would be harder to take away).

Another mythical carrot to lure voters to the polls, again. I cant imagine people falling for this lie, again.

oh, are we using "number of lies told" as a metric to judge? ok, here

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html
- Don't feed the troll.
- Deflecting and burying your head in the sand doesn't get rid of the fact that Democrats have promised time and again to protect rights when in reality they've weaponized them so they can raise campaign money.
"I don't believe Kamala actually wants to restore Roe v Wade, so I'm going to support the party that took it away in the first place!"

Makes sense to me!
- Point to where I said I would vote for the orange rapist?
I mean, if the Republicans get control, they will absolutely push for a nationwide abortion ban:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/03/22/fact-sheet-house-republicans-endorse-a-national-abortion-ban-with-zero-exceptions-in-latest-budget/

The elimination of birth control:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-republicans-block-bill-protect-americans-access-contraception-rcna155448

And no-fault divorce (read as "woman initiated divorce"):

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jun/25/republicans-no-fault-divorce

Some have even openly discussed removing womens right to vote:

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/09/21/politics/john-gibbs-womens-suffrage-19th-amendment-kfile

Now, regardless of whether or not the Democratic party would actually PROTECT these things or not is irrelevant. They definitely would not express interest in restrictions the way the Republicans do.

This is why it's important to vote an all blue ticket. The alternative is literal Christofascism.
- Still not voting a blue ticket, theyve had 50 years to fix this shit and ignored women's rights in order to raise money and stay in power. Theyve held women's reproductive rights hostage and demand we bail them out everytime an election comes around. They have proven they can't be trusted