"Gamers Nexus, on the other hand, thinks the issue is more deep rooted and originates from a foundry-level fault."
The GN piece makes it very clear that this claim is not definitely true but is a line of inquiry.
Intel statement does not definitely exclude this hypothesis, the flawed CPU might need the lower voltage to work around the flaw.
The obvious question this article does not address is what will be the performance hit for the patched parts?
That's a bit annoying to see GN so grossly misquoted when Steve spends half the run time of the video explaining that they are not sure of anything at this point.
He's just really thorough. They have a text-based website too if you prefer that format for reviews, but they don't always have time to make text articles of their investigative pieces and news reports.
This doesn't seem like the whole story, and it's awfully convenient that everything will be fixed AFTER the AMD launch next week, when they've known about this issue for over a year.
Alderon Games is accusing Intel of running damage control here.
It's not the whole story. After Intel's press release about voltage issues and an upcoming microcode patch, they quietly snuck out an admission that there is an oxidization problem after all. It smells like they're trying to downplay that and avoid having to replace their faulty CPUs.
They won't, since Intel has quietly admitted now that there is an oxidization issue too. Microcode can't fix that, and if it can work around it, it will do so at a significant performance cost.