'Very aggressive' homeless camp crackdown coming in August, mayor says
'Very aggressive' homeless camp crackdown coming in August, mayor says
Mayor London Breed said a "very aggressive" sweep of San Francisco homeless encampments will start in August after a recent Supreme Court ruling cleared the path for officials to widespread enforcement.
Mayor London Breed said a “very aggressive” sweep of San Francisco homeless encampments will start in August, after a recent Supreme Court ruling cleared the path for widespread enforcement.
In June, the Supreme Court ruled that enforcing rules against homeless people for sleeping outside doesn’t violate the Eighth Amendment’s “cruel and unusual punishment” clause.
On Thursday, Breed celebrated the ruling and said the city plans to change its protocols and may begin issuing criminal penalties against homeless people.
“Thank goodness for the change in the Supreme Court decision,” Breed said at an election debate hosted by a local firefighter’s union. “Effective August, we are going to be very aggressive and assertive in moving encampments, which may even include criminal penalties.”
Or how about you actually build some housing for these people?
edit: i guess i should have said affordable housing...
We already built more than enough houses. The problem is that bank and landlords profits contribute to economic growth, the mandate of capitalism. Housing the homeless would contribute far more to economic growth. But, it'd take more than four years to see the results.
So no. We can't house them. The need to suffer because otherwise capitalism is threatened.
The chronically homeless, the ones that are hardest to get off the street, are difficult to house for reasons besides availability or cost, though.
And we could still fund a facility and staff to house and treat them and it would be cheaper than the current emergency services and courts costs. It would also be more humane and prevent massive encampments from forming.
Oh, fuck it then
Cool, how about everyone else that is homeless?
There's not as much profit in it, so the private sector won't touch it, it's that simple.
We need social housing, designed and built to be as affordable as possible, with the option to rent at just above cost or rent to buy.
Of course, the usual twats will start crying about socialism but fuck them. If capitalism fails then the state has to step in.
Housing costs money so evicting them is actually saving money. /S
We need affordable housing AND mandated drug / phsyc treatment programs for some of these people. One without the other won’t help enough.
Too many people lack compassion.
I almost became homeless myself recently because the landlord wanted his house back after me renting the place for 19 years. It wasn't my fault, and I simply cannot afford rent anywhere else with my SSDI income.
All the usual suggestions and arguments in favor of homeless sweeps and victim blaming fall apart for people like me: shelters are not an option because I don't always stay sane when exposed to too many people; I'm not on recreational drugs at this time, so I can't be dismissed as deserving of homelessness for that reason; I'm taking my meds as I should; I can't get HUD vouchers because I'm sleeping on a relative's porch; mental institutions are not an option unless I'm in imminent danger of hurting myself or others; etc.
The reality is that a person in need often faces roadblock after roadblock when trying to find housing, and there aren't enough funds handed out to solve the problem. I'm just grateful to be one of the lucky few who is stabilizing with a roof over my head, incomplete as it is.
I think most people just won't care until it happens to them.
The Bell Riots are on schedule for September, I see.
Yes breed, go harder right, you'll definitely not alienate more of your voters and leave room for peskin. You'll definitely pick up votes to your right from the billionaire backed candidates that they really want.
NIMBY