So I got hit with Microsoft's Windows 11 nag screen...

I bought Microsoft Office Home & Student 2021 ... a one-time non-subscription purchase. Today I found this:

I was able to figure out how to "re-activate" without signing up to 365. But damn sure seems like a dark pattern to me

https://massgrave.dev
Was this screenshot taken with Recall? 😂.......😭
- This is peak humor idk why anyone's downvoting this 😂
i saw that on a new install of the 'non-sub' office last month. stupid af, just another way of scamming for subscriptions.

I'm kinda tired of hearing bs like “if only linux was good enough”.

It is. You just have to install and use it.

We're close. We just need a couple of vendors to step up and take some responsibility.

Steam already picked up all the hard stuff.

Adobe products, Outlook, and of all fucking things Roblox.

I probably also really wouldn't hurt if somebody could manage to make Nvidia background removal working OBS Linux.
- Yeah the Roblox thing is hard to swallow, it used to work better on Linux than on any other platform for me. Everything else there's alternatives - my local PC shop sells machines at a significant discount "without windows installed", maybe if more did that the market would take care of things and the software vendors would have to support Linux.
- Roblox runs great on Linux, they just explicitly blocked it right?
I used Linux daily for 20 years.

Linux may be ready, the mainstream software isn't.

Are you working with Adobe? Good luck.

Want to play some multiplayer game? Good luck, again.

Oh yes, chrome and Firefox run fine. Just disregard LibreOffice, it's disappointing.
I've been using it for around 30 years on my desktop and haven't really had issues with it.
Narrator: it wasn't

What is it specifically about Linux that doesn't work for you?

I'm asking because I've been using it for almost a quarter of a century as my main desktop.

Not OP, but just to serve as another data point: mostly just exhaustion. I am a full-time software developer, so I just really don't want to deal with configurations and set up complex systems at home. That's why I haven't gotten into any smart-home stuff, either - I just don't have the bandwidth to deal with the issues that come along with the space.
- Not sure how long ago you tried installing linux, but it has come a long way such that there are distros out there that are basically plug-and-play installable now. I installed Linux Mint on an old laptop and just went through the gui installer like you would on a Windows installation, and it was up and running. Didn’t need to open the terminal even once.
- Wild, I'm not a developer but I do some very basic coding. Linux out of the box has it all pretty much lol. If it doesn't, the package manager has it easily. Windows is such a hassle with environment variables and downloading different tools like compilers and IDEs and shit.
- In 2024 using linux is far less cognitively demanding than using windows
I answered a bit further down a bit lengthier. Hope that's OK. 🙂

To be clear, I enjoy my Linux environment. But could I leave Linux on my parents' devices who recently bought a new printer and use a facial recognition camera? I'd be worried...
- It's funny how well linux works with printers, no stupid hp app, no configuration. Just hit print and done.
15 years for me. It's pretty great.
Not OP but personally, I've always had an impossible time trying to get drivers to work for my GPU to do more than just render 2D stuff like the desktop and basic web browsing.
Not OP, but it's still lack of hardware support for me. I tried to daily Linux on my laptop and gave up in frustration after several months because a few key pieces of hardware are not supported and seemingly never will be.
- What year, what distro, which laptop?
The only reason I don't use Linux all the time are video games - which are getting better, and streaming because DRM doesn't support it and I can tell the difference between 720p and 4k. Otherwise it's my main OS.
- Video games are nearly perfect today. The only ones that don't work are the ones where the publishers have gone out of their way to exclude it by enforcing their anticheat nonsense.
UI/UX mostly. Yeah you can do a lot of things, but the experience doing it isn't as easy. Ex: gimp. Which has gotten a lot of hate here recently (and deservedly so)
Programs are working better on Linux these days, but I use both the Adobe Suite as well as AutoCAD regularly, neither of which are supported by Linux. Otherwise I'd switch.
Okay i been this with a lot Linux does not work if you are trying to use it at even likely advance stage

I can't find where exe is

I can't put that exe in start-up of system (tried it on zorin and pop os )

Wine won't open lot of programs

Libre office has came long way but make a doc in libre office and tried to open in word later it's a mess and can't work that for CV

Excel is THE tool to be used in many cases, can't be used powerfully in Linux.

There is need to use terminal multiple times for lot of things Linux is NOT useful, windows might be forcing but it's a ripe operating system. Across all Linux distors even the shell is not same.
- I'm going to answer your points below. Not because I want to tell you to move to Linux, but because the information you state is incorrect. Linux is not for everybody. It works for millions of people and it works for me, but that doesn't mean it will be what you're looking for.
  
  In order:
  
  There are no .exe files. Neither are there any on MacOS, iOS, Android, or anything else that isn't Windows/DOS. To start software requires that it's on the search path in exactly the same way that Windows requires. You can see what that is with the command: echo $PATH. Most Linux distributions have a graphical user interface which features icons and menus, but if you don't want that, you don't need to install it.
  
  You absolutely can, but it doesn't work the same way as Windows, because it's not Windows. You can for example login to Linux because the login manager started at system startup. You see a desktop after logging in because there's a startup system for your account. The printer works because the software driving the print queue is started.
  
  Wine is a tool. It's not a replacement for Windows. It's not intended to be. It's intended to help users and developers make Windows software work better on Linux.
  
  LibreOffice is one of many office suites. I have been using it as my productivity software for 25 years in my company and I'm not at all disappointed to have escaped the Microsoft Clippy, Ribbons, Office365 abominations.
  
  I have used Libre Calc for most of my numerical analysis processes. I used real tools like R and gnuplot when I was analyzing terabytes of data.
  
  The terminal is a tool. I use it daily. At any time there's a dozen of them open. Not everyone needs a terminal, but there are plenty of things that you can only do in a terminal. A random example, list all the files in your account, group them by extension, then add up how much space each extension takes. In case you're wondering:
  
  find ~ -type f | egrep -o "\.[a-zA-Z0-9]+$" | sort -u | LC_ALL=C xargs -I '%' find . -type f -name "*%" -exec du -ch {} + -exec echo % \; | egrep "^\.[a-zA-Z0-9]+$|total$" | uniq | paste - -
  
  Source: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/457241
  
  Linux is not Windows. It never was and it never will be, neither is any other operating system. The community around Linux is helpful, the ecosystem is vibrant and it's free. If you want to pay for support, you can. If you don't, there's plenty of opportunity to do your own thing.
  
  If you want it to be like Windows, you're going to be very disappointed.

Linux Mint is ready for mainstream.

Already switched my laptop to mint. It's great, except dealing with ALSA has been a nightmare.

I hate how hard they try to force you to use a Microsoft account with it. And yes, the hardware requirements are too stringent. Microsoft works hard at taking away agency from users and empowering the users' corporate bosses and data miners instead.

On top of all that, it's 2024, Microsoft...a lot of people are struggling to buy groceries or pay rent/mortgage. They don't want to be forced to buy a new PC.

As for "just use Linux" crowd....you know what? I agree! And some people will migrate. But it's going to be sort of like the reddit > Lemmy migration. Don't get overly excited about it.

We don't need everyone to migrate, just enough that companies and developers feel obligated to support Linux. We're slowly getting there. Valve throwing their weight behind Linux for gaming was a massive win for Linux. Another important factor is the rise of the mobile first generations and the fact that at its core Android is Linux based. It's not completely trivial to port an Android app to Linux but it's at least no worse than porting it to Windows.

Microsoft may still have a stranglehold on corporate desktops, but they've long since lost the battle for servers and their hold on the home desktop is slipping a little more each day. Losing a significant chunk of gamers to Linux would be a massive blow to MS because it has been one of the few really unassailable markets for them historically.
- You are so optimistic
- I really do hope to see more and more people migrate away from Windows to Linux. I truly despise Microsoft these days. But it's not easy for everyone, or even possible in all cases, and for multiple reasons. (And, real talk, a lot of home users won't care enough to bother).
  
  This gentleman in the video link I'm pasting explains 3 reasons why he's stuck with Windows. Some of these apply to me as well. And there are other reasons I'm still stuck, too. At least for now. So it's frustrating when I see some of the knee jerk "just migrate, bro!" comments because 1. I agree with them and 2. some of us can't. Not yet, anyway.
  
  https://youtu.be/c6YDQobJbLc?si=rwoH3wHanzyf_E0U
Lemmy > reddit

😁

I downgraded from 11 to 10 and disabled TPM. Fuck you Microsoft. I'll pay for antivirus once support ends.

Antivirus won't do s*** for you, if a good exploit comes through they don't need a virus they just do whatever they want. Even the best EDR packages out there have their limits if you don't keep updates.
I like how Microsoft managed to not just shoot there own foot but somehow managed to rip off there own legs. They are driving Win10 market share but also telling people to move on.

Linux is mainstream ready. A lot of people still just use a web browser. For decades now Linux came with an intuitive GUI driven installer, a whole live Linux OS running on a CD when windows still used a dos like setup. Linux has worked great for decades to use a web browser, which is a lot of what people do on computers.

Therein lies the problem. The kind of people who only use a web browser have absolutely no need to use Linux as there are far better options

The kind of people who would like to switch to Linux do far more than just use a web browser, and Linux still doesn't "just work" after all this time
- I mean, I daily drive it and play games and edit video in Davinci Resolve. Works for me.
I mean I've been daily driving Linux and more recently Bazzite specifically for games and everything else without issue.

~~Why do you think Linux isn't ready for mainstream use? Just curious.~~ edit: nevermind, I see you've already discussed this.

I went full switch recently, and haven't hit any major roadblocks yet. I feel like I could've done this years ago too.

I'm hoping to make the switch next month. Building out a new gaming system and going to try going all in on Linux again. Long ago I was a full time Linux user, but with the rise of Steam and the spotty support of wine I couldn't justify staying with it. Now that Proton is good enough to cover 90%+ of my games library I'm returning to where I started.
- Nice! I'm excited for you! Hope it works out this time!

I switched to fedora on memorial day weekend, installed it along side windows. I would definitely say Linux is now ready for mainstream use based on my experience with an atomic desktop. I haven't had a reason to boot back into windows yet.

What are you trying to do that you don't think you can do on Linux? Also there's ways to install Windows 11 on unsupported systems.

Tbf, I work with Linux regularly and it's great for me. But for the average user who wants basically zero learning curve like your average Android provides? Linux is a hard sell. To repeat what has been said so many times here:

Games. It's better than it used to be, but Windows just does it better. The same goes for general software compatibility. Windows Store apps, for example, generally don't run at all.

My surrounding never wants to open or see a command line. Ever.

Driver & hardware support. Windows still beats Linux here. And this is an important one.

Easy compatibility between distros. What works on one may not work on another. That's a problem.

Like that.

Really, for someone willing to learn how their PC works, Linux is a good choice, maybe even a great choice. I love my Linux PCs. Am on OpenSuse at the moment and its been a fantastic experience. Couldn't avoid some of the problems above, of course. But this isn't about me.

For someone who just wants to click and install games, plug in random hardware and start using it a few seconds later, never touch an update interface and basically wants a system that just works intuitively because that's what they've known for years... Windows is a better choice. And I say this with a sad heart, because I really wish that Linux was the competitor that Microsoft fears.

Edit: thanks for the reminder; I will likely install Windows 11 (the unsupported version as it were) for my immediate surrounding, apart from some techies. 😄
- I hear ya. I bought a AMD CPU+GPU laptop to run Linux on, but a month later I'm back to Windows.
  
  While the default graphics driver worked most of the time, I had random graphic card crashes on a 20 year old Wine-ran game. Even the official amdgpu driver had issues (PITA to install as its not being maintained). No issues with newer games through Steam (Proton is amazeballs) fortunately. I also had random issues with a second monitor not being detected that were probably graphics driver related. Some random UI focus issues were likely a window manager issue (KDE).
  
  Sleep/hibernate doesn't work 'out of the box' and I couldn't get it working reliably after screwing with grub. It was a gamble if it would actually power down or just go back to the lock screen. I don't know why its so difficult for a basic thing that's been around for decades.
  
  So now I'm back on Windows, everything works as expected. Honestly I love Linux and its leaps and bounds better from what it was, but Windows is a still better choice for hardware support reasons. I'll give it another try if AMD gets it together with their driver support.
- I want Linux to succeed, and be the competition to Windows, so I deal with these "downsides" honestly, the limits in my theory, cause me to only purchase good hardware and software.
  
  Is the mainstream even what should be targeted? I'm reading comments on how people are actually getting worse at using computers.

I would say Linux was more ready for mainstream use 10 years ago. Now with Wayland and (god forbid) Nvidia is quite unstable. And if the best advice is "do not buy Nvidia", then indeed it isn't ready for the mainstream use.

I've heard a lot of people pretty happy with explicit sync

My largest showstoppers with Linux is the lack of DRM support, the lack of "just works" installs, no Parsec (I've tried Moonlight/Sunshine many, many, many times, it never works for me), and ... this one little thing ...

I would use Linux more if either Virtual Desktop or Steam Link worked in Linux. As it stands, neither work, and current implementations of VR in Linux are still alpha / experimental beyond Index / SteamVR direct tethering, not an option for someone that has a cheap standalone headset.

You are saying steam link for VR correct? Because Steam Link itself works fine.

The only thing I have to dual boot for is VR at this point. And I havent even done that in maybe 2 years. But it really is the final thing for me.

All the other games I care to play work fine. The last two Resident Evil's were flawless. Almost everything is pretty much click and play these days.

I remote to other computers and remote into my own, so I take it you are using Parsec for something specific? I never used it before.
- Parsec is like Moonlight / Sunshine in that it video streams your desktop for remote access. It is very low latency and lets you even game remotely. I've used it to remotely video edit and also test things, mainly to control my beefy desktop from my laptop in a remote location. The difference between Moonlight and Parsec is, Parsec's 1000x less painful to setup, especially when connecting from across the internet.
Parsec's own website offers a linux download. I've never used the software, but are you saying it doesn't work?
- The client works fine, but you can't host a linux system using Parsec.
So AMD, Nvidia and Intel all have DRM support as that is what draws content to the screen. Without DRM you wouldn't have a GPU. You can see it in /dev/dri
- not the same DRM

Microsoft hasn’t detailed ESU pricing for consumers yet, but the company did previously reveal it will offer these extended updates to consumers for the first time ever

They're actually gonna make us pirate security updates huh

photopea and gimp.

good rage bait, got a few