Last major Arabic-style mosque in China loses its domes
Last major Arabic-style mosque in China loses its domes
Exclusive: Experts say changes to Grand Mosque of Shadian mark completion of five-year sinification campaign
![Last major Arabic-style mosque in China loses its domes](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c77f2767-8ed8-44b7-9e2b-abfd43316318.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
You're viewing part of a thread.
Someone already showed that the linked article was outdated nonsense almost the minute it was published.
But if you want more, take a look at the pictures at the top of their page on fascism, note the non-fascists in the picture and the conspicuous absence of Francisco Franco.
https://justapedia.org/wiki/Fascism
Edit: Furthermore- https://x.com/JustapediaF/status/1757941868778700982
3 0 ReplySomeone already showed that the linked article was outdated nonsense almost the minute it was published.
Where? Everything I’m reading says that most of the new state-level areas are inhabited and not “ghost cities.” Unless Ohio State is wrong.
1 0 ReplyIt's really not hard to go through a conversation chain.
https://lemmy.world/comment/10300436
But I notice you ignored all the stuff about the source being far right, so I'm guessing none of this actually matters to you anyway.
1 0 ReplyI care about the facts and the truth, not the source, as should you.
But I notice you ignored all the left-wing sources I provided that demonstrates the new areas in China are populated and not “ghost cities,” so I'm guessing none of this actually matters to you anyway.
1 0 ReplyThis is what you said which started this conversation:
I was just reading about it. It’s another web encyclopedia trying to incorporate other encyclopedias to compete against Wikipedia’s biases.
I showed you that the whole thing is about Wikipedia not having a right-wing bias.
I thought you cared about facts and truth?
2 0 ReplyI do. I admitted Justapedia was a biased source:
Edit: I read through the [page](https://justapedia.org/wiki/Fascism) on Fascism. It’s crap, runaway.
but the references linked were credible.
I’ll admit when I’m wrong, will you?
Five studies, including two from Harvard researchers, have found a left-wing bias at Wikipedia:
- A Harvard study found Wikipedia articles are more left-wing than Encyclopedia Britannica.
- Another paper from the same Harvard researchers found left-wing editors are more active and partisan on the site.
- A 2018 analysis found top-cited news outlets on Wikipedia are mainly left-wing.
- Another analysis using AllSides Media Bias Ratings™ found that pages on American politicians cite mostly left-wing news outlets.
- American academics foundconservative editors are 6 times more likely to be sanctioned in Wikipedia policy enforcement. source
1 0 ReplyWhen did I say Wikipedia didn't have a bias? Please quote me.
Again, if you care about the truth, you'll show where I made that claim that you think you're refuting.
2 0 ReplyMaybe I misread it. I’m not concerned with winning an argument, only with correcting the misinformation about “ghost cities.” I did that. Now I just have to wait for Legoland Sichuan to open in 2025 in the new state-level are of Tianfu. Hopefully it won’t be too crowded, since it’s a “ghost city.”
1 0 Reply"Maybe" you misread what?
I never claimed Wikipedia had no bias. I never even implied it.
You berated me for not caring about facts and truth, then you lied about me, now you won't even admit it was a lie.
1 0 ReplyI continually try to de-escalate, and disengage. And you continue to antagonize and misrepresent my intent.
Take a breath. I’m not worth the amount of energy you’re putting into this.
1 0 ReplyWell, it seems you don't actually care about facts and truth.
2 0 Reply