Gas prices [...] starter kit.

Hot take: pick-up trucks should be illegal as daily drivers. You should need either a commercial license or permit. Vast majority of truck drivers don't need them regularly as a truck or to tow; they're just status symbols and make driving more dangerous for everyone else. Not to mention the inefficiency.

There's an easier solution. A vehicle weight tax that actual laborers are exempted from. Weight is what damages the roads, so a weight tax would accomplish practical and ideological goals.
- Why should actual laborers be exempt from them? Do you mean to say that if they drive a company truck, then they wouldn't have to pay weight taxes? (I would think it wise to have the company pay taxes for miles driven and weight of the vehicle driven during those miles)
You could do that, but in southern states they’d just make it too easy to get the permit. See Oklahoma’s “commercial vehicle” loophole where everyone has their car zoned commercial to get a tax write off. Also electric pickup trucks are a thing.
- That and there are plenty of people who need a truck regularly enough to justify owning one vs renting one, but don't use it comercially. The "permitting" for this would have so much gray area, it wouldn't be worth it. Additionally, if you told all those people they couldn't have a truck, they'd just go get an SUV and you wouldn't really accomplish anything.
Hot take: Let people enjoy what they want. Hypercars and planes are much worse than pick-up trucks.
- Let's not. Some people's enjoyment causes a lot of pain for other people, and sometimes i mean literally
How else am I supposed to get my lumber from Home Depot every other week?
- Is that for your job? You're in the extreme minority if you need 6'+ lumber twice a month. Also renting a $30 uhaul pickup for that will 100% be cheaper than buying and maintaining a pickup truck. $720/yr. You're just looking for reasons to drive a truck daily for the aesthetics.

Bonus points for living on a 5 million dollar "rural" property 1:30 from the city center where they work.

Just call them what they are for so many, emotional support vehicles.

I don't care what anyone says, it's just a fact that the vast majority of people who use these huge trucks as daily drivers do not actually need to. Obviously there are exceptions, but they are relatively uncommon.

I use my mid-sized pickup as a daily driver, but that's because I used to need it and my work situation recently changed. My plan is to get a little commuter car as soon as I can and use that as my daily driver and keep the truck for when I actually need it. The gas savings will pay for it, and again, I don't even drive a full-sized pickup.

If you want to buy a second smaller car that's fine, but just don't do it because you think it'll help the environment, because it'll actually have the opposite effect. Producing a car takes a huge amount of energy and creates a huge amount of carbon pollution and other waste. The amount of gas (and thus pollution) you'd save by using a new small car will never come close to making up for the pollution that was created in the production of that car.
The most environmentally helpful choice is for people to keep using their current car for as long as they can, no matter how much gas it guzzles or oil it leaks.
With that said, life is of course much more complicated than that, so it shouldn't be the only factor you consider in deciding whether or not to buy a new car.
EDIT
To the couple of people who downvoted this, I'm not just making stuff up, this is information I heard from scientific sources. Here's citations:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/when-used-cars-are-more-ecofriendly/
- Agreed. That said, it's not my intention to buy a "new" small car. Why would it be when what I want is something that's fuel-efficient and cheap?
  A "new" car never even occurred to me.

Also always drives 130 on the highway and accelerates as aggressively as possible. Then they post on Facebook complaining about the new carbon tax.

But if I ask for help it's a "handout".

Most have no clue how 'not bad' trucks really are when compared to cars. My full ton diesel is 7500 lbs and gets 30mpg on the highway and 20mpg in the city. While nowhere near as good as tiny cars are, it's better than most sportscars and I also have a 32 foot 5th wheel RV. My fuel consumption pales in comparison to anyone that flies out of country for a vacation.
- That's not just better than most sports cars, it's also better than many SUV's. They really aren't bad as daily drivers, and then open up the option to get trailers and haul
- People who drive pickups are just easy to demonize. I need one for work and it is also how I go camping. There’s no way I could fit my work tools into even an SUV easily, let alone go camping in one. I think most people just like to assume anyone with a pickup uses it as a status symbol rather than thinking about the people who have good reason to own one.
- 25 mph is quite bad by modern standards. So I don’t agree with this assessment. You are deliberately burning double the amount of fuel of some vehicles. I can’t speak for you but most truck drivers only use their unique attributes on an extremely intermittent basis. It would be better and cheaper to just rent a truck for the 3 times a year those people need one.
  Also, diesel vehicles are extra awful in terms of local air pollution.

Also "we need 4 wheel drive because of the snow" never bothers with snow tires

It is funny seeing trucks/suv off the road when i zoom past in my Civic with snow tires.

Newer F150s are getting >20 mpg in real world scenarios. That’s better than my Forester.

Probably better to just kill gas motors entirely.

I went and looked up the metric equivalent. That's 8.5 km/l or 14 l/100 km. That's honestly disgusting.
Especially disgusting when you know most people with an F150 use it 90% of the time to go to work, alone, without any 6m rebars in the bed and would be better served by a Yaris that can do 20-25 km/l (ie 45-60 mpg)
What about L/100 Km metric ?
- 20mpg sucks fyi. A fiesta gets 55 if you are careful 45 if you push it.
- There's an online converter: 11,7607 l/100km

For a split second I thought they posted a picture of a Lightning and I was gonna laugh.