Is this saying that human teeth are somehow not the teeth of omnivores?
With incisors for cutting, canines for gripping and molars for chomp chomping?
We fill the same ecological spot as pigs, we voraciously eat everything with detriment to our surroundings.
Right? I’m all for vegans making a moral choice to not eat animal products, I think the world would be a better place if we all did, but you don’t need to justify it with incorrect biological conjecture.
It's saying that we don't have carnivore teeth. And "omnivore" is very ambiguous.
https://www.pnas.org/content/110/51/20617 pigs and anchovies
You don't get an ought from an is.
Omnivore is ambiguous?
It’s a pretty clearly defined word in context, our teeth have evolved for the use we put them to. Apes eat vegetative material and flesh. Mostly vegetative, little bit of flesh. That’s a pretty common ape trait.
That is beside the point of veganism and if it is moral for us to do it now that we know better, it just simply is a fact of nature.
Your thoughts do not care about what our bodies evolved to do in nature. You can use your teeth for whatever you like now.
There is no concept of veganism outside of humanity and that’s fine.
dafuq did thier canines go? Its incisors all the way across
