Imagine there being a website so popular that game console manufacturers put a dedicated button on their controllers to take and post screenshots and then you fuck the website up so much that they
disable it
) Nintendo of America @NintendoAmerica · May 9:
As of June 10, 2024, it will no longer be possible to post screenshots and
videos to X (formerly Twitter) from the Nintendo Switch's Album, or send friend
requests to social media users via the Friend Suggestions feature.
Find out more: ninten.do/6010YVr2a
TBF, if it was because the site was so fucked up they would have left a while ago. No, it is because of Twitter attempting to extort even more money for API use. Playstation and XBox are also removing it.
There are no morals in these gigantic corporations, just ledger sheets.
What is this person even talking about? There's no dedicated button to post screenshots. There's a screenshot button, but you had to go into the album menus to post them.
They also don't. They have "create" (playstation) and "share" (xbox) buttons. Both are multi-function and configurable and posting to twitter is one of the functions you can access through them. Neither is dedicated to posting to twitter.
I particularly enjoy that they repeat it 5 times in their blog post, because they really did not feel like readers would know which "X" they're referring to.
It reminds me of when Prince changed his name to an illegible symbol and everyone said, "Haha, no." and started calling him "The artist formerly known as Prince" because a whole sentence was easier.
He only did that because Warner Bros argued that they owned the Prince trademark, despite it being his actual name, and wouldn't let him use it outside of a contract with them.
Him changing his artist name was basically a big 'fuck you' to them, and TAFKAP being in common usage was an even bigger one.
I'm surprised that Nintendo lets people share screenshots and videos, given how eager they are to issue takedown requests at random whenever any of their properties is shown on the internet for whatever reason
Perhaps they thought it would be an extra source of revenue to make it easy for kids to post shit online that Nintendo can sue them for. Maybe they disabled it because they realized that gamers aren't ready to accept that at this point so they'll circle back in a decade or so.
Devil's advocate: Given how many old TVs there are out there that are still working and have dedicated buttons for long-dead streaming services, is this really that a big of a deal? The moral of the story is don't put dedicated buttons that go to services you don't control on your products. But that'll never happen...
Look, I get it; I'm 36. But I've also come to terms with the fact that 1990 was not actually 10 years ago. Smart TVs have been around for long enough now that old ones can exist. Especially given how much faster the tech is evolving now.
My last TV from 2020 only lasted 2 years before I sold it and got a newer set. The old one couldn't even hit 120Hz @ 4K; it could only do it at 1440p. So when I built a new gaming PC, I had to get rid of it just to be able to play at my TVs native resolution and refresh rate. And don't even get me started on how much better and more affordable OLED is now compared to inferior display tech like IPS and VA. Just four years ago they would have been out of my budget. Which proves my point that TV tech evolves much more quickly than it used to.
One difference being that Twitter is not (technically) dead - Nintendo Is removing support for a service that continues to exist, presumably because they don't want to be associated with it.
And it bears repeating that none of the console companies are willing to pay the $ 42,000 minimum of monthly access fee to Twitter’s API, when they used to use this functionality freely. Twitter is hard pressed to make a case for them to do so, especially given the platform’s own current fortunes
Not that there's any chance of it happening, but this would be an ideal use of the shared Mastodon/Pixelfed API. All the social media functionality, none of the being associated with any particular service provider.