Do you also configure the feedback to send everything?

It's funny: if the telemetry is opt-in, I'll opt in, if it's opt-out, I'll opt out

Hey man, I just like pressing buttons, switches, and dragging sliders. I don't need to know what they do as long as they aren't what they were before
- For some reason this got me wondering what the anti-default Plasma install would be like, with every single option set to a non-default value.

Yes. It's all about transparency. I can see exactly what KDE is exporting, so I'm willing to help KDE. I cannot say the same for closed source software.

Yes. I trust KDE to not misuse my data

No. Nothing against KDE I just want to minimise all information leaving my computer. If something is bothering me I try to change it myself or make a bug report or feature request.

Same, I report crashes, but regular telemetry is rather not

Yes. I trust and support KDE

My systems generally do send all the feedback to the KDE devs, so I help determine where effort should be put next.

Yes, I like the transparency and want to help KDE however I can

Yes, I like KDE and am happy to help. And I really like the fact that it shows an example of what data is being sent. If more software did this, I would be willing to do it more often.

Yup, it bugs me a lot that they refuse to disclose the data so that we all can learn from it (especially for statistics practitioners)

The issue is that this data can be used to fingerprint or de-anonomize users. Even if it's just a big list of statistics, knowing how likely or unlikely a system change, setting change, version, etc. is can help greatly with a person looking to pin down users. They'll know how likely a person with a specific pattern is the same person.

I'm glad it's not distributed. If it was, I'd slide it all the way back to 0. Good intentions from the collectors doesn't stop bad intentions of consumers
- Datasets are still valuable for the broader community - there are many datasets out there, like the Brain project or the Oasis project which provide important insights into brain illnesses to train state of the art ML models on.
  
  Any practitioner who wishes to work on those datasets is to sign a contract where they pledge not to try to identify any patient.
  
  These kinds of contracts have been around for a while now, and if we could negotiate a situation as tricky as brain illnesses, I'm certain the same can be done for which version you have of a software, which particular config changes one has made or, say, if you use KActivities at all.

I'm doing my part!

That actually works on two levels, getting rid of bugs. Good one.

Yup

No, but for me even the crash reporter doesn't actually work so I assume the same would go for those analytics.

I do but using firejail on my system the feedback doesn't work :(