Seeking review of book/plan related bannings - > Removed (edit: then banned)
Seeking review of book/plan related bannings - > Removed (edit: then banned)
![the background blur](https://lemmy.whynotdrs.org/pictrs/image/df6be119-0e15-4f3f-99c9-f525c9e5a7d4.png?thumbnail=256&format=webp)
![](https://lemmy.whynotdrs.org/pictrs/image/df6be119-0e15-4f3f-99c9-f525c9e5a7d4.png?thumbnail=1024&format=webp)
As a reminder, due to the unfortunate risk of escalating tensions, please limit content in this community to factual record. Please do not include commentary on presumed motivations, intentions, shillery, name-calling, etc.
Original post: https://old.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/152a2r1/the_mod_team_seriously_needs_to_look_into_all_the/
Auto-crosspost: https://lemmy.whynotdrs.org/post/20348
On-reddit commentary: https://www.reddit.com/r/drsgme/comments/152d1bm/a_story_in_3_pictures_sad_to_see_history_repeat/
For context, I believe the "no meta content" mandate by RAdmins only covered content which was cross-sub or person-oriented, and not content on intra-sub moderation policy/practice, a belief which was not resolved in attempted discussion | with | mods. Nevertheless, the more expansively no-meta content rule adopted by mods is frequently used to shut down discussion of our own community's moderation policies and practices.
Update: Banned - https://lemmy.whynotdrs.org/post/22099
Due to the unfortunate risk of escalating tensions, please limit content in this community to factual record. Please do not include commentary on presumed motivations, intentions, shillery, name-calling, etc.