Why Heat Pumps Are the Future, and How Your Home Could Use One
Why Heat Pumps Are the Future, and How Your Home Could Use One
The highly efficient devices are the darlings of the environmental movement. Here’s why.
Obligatory reminder to watch Technology Connections on the correct sizing and backups - the initial quote might be 2x or 3x what you need.
Is there an even longer version? Technology Connections is like LOTR - an extra few hours is always welcome.
Do you have a link? I can’t seem to find it.
Someone else linked the main video, here is the playlist.
Basics:
- It's just an air conditioner with an extra valve to reverse the flow.
- They work in much colder weather than you are imagining.
- They are more efficient than you are imagining.
- They are even better if you look for the latest models coming out of the far east.
- Actually do the calculations for how much power you need - don't just let the installers say "This house currently has x kW of heating, therefore it will need an x kW heat pump" (same for the air conditioning mode)
- It's probably better to have a resistive heat backup for occasional extreme-cold days than to have an oversized heat pump.
How is this even a question? Heat pumps have been standard in new homes for at least 40 years now.
Don't know what municipality/region/state/country you're from, but that's not the case here
The article is about NYC where buildings are all much older than 50 years. But for the rest of the country? Everyone has known that heat pumps are more efficient for decades which is why they are standard for all new installs. Unless you live in northern Canada, they save money which is why everyone chooses them. Of course there is backup heat for extreme cold which is why it's always hybrid heatpump with electric or glass backup.
Not in all US states and not in all countries. And some climate deniers are even fear-mongering people against heat pumps.
They haven't been standard in colder parts of the US — people use natural gas, propane, or fuel oil depending on where in the country.
I can believe that because many people choose the absolute cheapest solution rather than looking at the 5-10 year cost of ownership.
Technology connections YouTuber is in Chicago and chose a heat pump because it's cheaper. I have a relative in Minnesota and they are on a ground sourced heatpump because it's so much cheaper long term.
There's not much population in the US further north than the middle of Minnesota.
The main reason I'd be hesitant to get one is because I don't really ever set my thermostat to heat. Even during the once-in-a-lifetime freeze a few years ago, we never ran any heaters (granted, we live in an apartment, so only like 2.5 walls are exposed to the outside - would be very different in an actual house, but I'd still rather opt for better insulation, a single space heater, and a heated blanket over spending that same money on a heat pump that does nothing for years at a time).
I have a few people I know that installed heat pumps about 10 or 12 years ago, and they have failed at this point. The cost to repair is more than a new heat pump and they are just getting a standard Ac unit and using the backup gas furnace that has minimal hours on it as the main heat source now.
I feel like this is more inherent obsolescence of the companies making parts and not so much the tech itself?
It's definitely possible to buy low-quality appliances and end up with something which fails sooner than you'd want. That's true of every appliance out there.
There's a reason there are Consumer Reports reliability ratings for heat pumps — like they have for every other major appliance.
I agree that it might be a problem of lower-quality appliances. Anecdotally, mine is 20 years old and was repaired recently (some parts had to be manufactured as they don't make them anymore) and still works.
Is there an open alternative for Consumer Reports? The content of this link is blocked without a subscription it seems like. Thx!