Are you guys serious the cat obviously wrote the paper and just needed the Professor human for credibility. This is just like that movie with the rat in the chef hat , but it's a cat and a physicist
153 0 ReplyI think you mean Raccacoonie, the raccoon?
26 0 ReplyCattenheimer.
10 0 Reply
I would too, like to speak to the co-author
64 0 ReplyAnyone have an recent example of FDC Willard being thanked in a paper? I couldn't find any, sadly
41 0 ReplyThere are some listed on the Wikipedia page, which also contains this gem in the 'quick facts' section.
Known for. First cat to co-author a physics paper
46 0 ReplyBut I guess we can have "FDC Willard numbers" in the same way we can have Erdős numbers, right?
5 0 Reply
how is it that cats make everything better?
32 0 ReplyBy being perfect wonderful creatures. Duh.
4 0 Reply
That's a long lasting tradition to use "we" even in solo authored papers. I believe even Newton did this
29 0 ReplyThat’s a long lasting tradition to use “we” even in solo authored papers. We believe even Newton did this
32 0 ReplyIf our knowledge is based on our forebears, it would always be we.
3 0 Reply
The 2nd referee will nonetheless tell you to get rid of all of them
12 0 ReplyThe second referee once told us that our paper should not be published at all.
Eventually, it made it to the Editor's choice section of the journal
21 0 Reply
Yup, that was a requirement for most papers at my uni. We also use the plural you to show respect, even when talking to a single person.
1 0 ReplyReject modernity, embrace tradition 😆
2 0 Reply
This makes me happy
21 0 ReplySure, it's a cute story, but what about prof's grad students sitting in the background with weepy eyes?
19 0 ReplyThey should know better than to be where the public can see them
4 0 Reply
Find and replace "I" with "we"? Nah, we adding the kitty
19 0 ReplyFind and replace
a feature typewriters used in 1975 were famous for
96 0 ReplyDidn't catch the year ahaha
23 0 Reply
that's how you end up with dawizards
24 0 ReplyI was confused at first. Then, I realized that when they replaced ‘mage’ with ‘wizard’, ‘damage’ became ‘dawizard’. It is actually hilarious.
21 0 ReplyOn my device that’s one of those websites that don’t allow using the Back button.
Neat.
3 0 Reply
Isn't "I" considered poor form? I was taught to always write in passive but "we" is kind of the accepted exception.
6 0 Reply
He does exude an air of competence and arrogance in equal measure. Clearly tenured.
15 0 ReplyThis is totally valid. Rubber duck debugging is a thing. Heck, I've literally been a "Rubber Duck" for more than one person. I'm sure that Chester heard enough of the theory of the paper to claim the title of "
Rubber DuckLive Cat Debugger."11 0 Replyhttps://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1442
The referenced paper
9 0 Replydamn, I thought there would be a pawprint
6 0 ReplyThe pawprint we were all looking for.
4 0 Reply
It would have been a really hot topic of discussion if his last name had been Schrödinger.
4 0 ReplyReminds me of Yuri Knorozov and his cat Asya
2 0 Reply