2y ago

Absolutely not training data no way no sir

31 comments

Google photos and apple have been doing it for years too, they’re like we found this person 50 times in your photo collection, why don’t you name them?
- Apple, afaik, used to be doing this on-device rather than in the cloud. Not quite sure about the situation today.
  
  thats if u trust them
  
  Still on device for Samsung, not sure about others https://www.samsung.com/us/account/privacy-policy/#:~:text=Information%20Stored%20on%20Your%20Device%20Not%20Accessible%20to%20Samsung
Lmao, so fucking true
It's like tricking a kid into eating their vegetables
- Except vegetables are good for you.
  
  That's just what Big Vegetable wants you to think
Keeping in mind that the "training data" is also the "recognition database"
- OP called out training data specifically, like that was the real problem.
Tencent isn't the overlord of image generation lmao. This is using people's justified fears of China and surveillance to make a false comparison to image generation. All you're doing is giving more power to companies and states that will abuse it while limiting its use in open source contexts.
- How about we just not use people's personal identities for image generation at all?
  
  How about we just not let any drawings or paintings be made of others at all? I'm all for disallowing things like AI edited porn without consent but you can't arbitrarily apply one set of rules to image generation by computer and another to one done by hand when their outputs are fundamentally the same.
- 🤱shhhhhhhhhhh drink your milk
Why did I read it as “Y’all so stupid”?

31 comments