Critically acclaimed Dragon's Dogma 2 hits "mostly negative" on Steam after players raze it for microtransactions

Admittedly, most of the "Mostly Negative" Steam reviews seem to be reacting to the fact they exist at all, without considering whether they're actually critical to your progress in the game or not (for clarity, they are not).

I didn’t know we were only allowed to write reviews based on things critical to your progress. I didn’t know how many companions you have or what your character looks like weren’t critical. I bet if we searched even a little we’d find a RockPaperShotgun review of “non critical” game features.

What horseshit.

The microtransactions are bad enough, but the fact that none of these were present in the build given to reviewers just makes it worse. I mean people would still be complaining about them, but I don't think the backlash would be as bad if Capcom had made it clear from the start that the game was going to be riddled with microtransactions.

We are back to the arcade era where you had to put in more coins to get lives and the games are intensionally hard and unfair to get more coins.

This is what I was afraid of 15 years ago. I couldn't tell you the last time I bought a AAA game. This release is so disgusting.

I'd give it a zero out of ten just for being an RPG with a single save slot. They failed at the starting line. The got the core of RPGs completely wrong. Taking a shit on it with MTX seems like this was deliberate self sabotage

I wish people would vote with they're wallets and be more conscious with they're spending habits.

I've waited ten years for this game and am loving playing it now that it's out but I'm still giving a negative review and not buying any MTX.

I was thinking that Horizon Forbidden West had fucked up again and set their PC release for the same day as Dragon's Dogma 2.

But for once it actually worked out in their favour. Dragon's Dogma 2 has an awful PC port, while HFW is running very well.

The original dragons dogma had poor quality of life features and its arguably a large part of the appeal. No fast travel, no multiple saves. If you didn’t like your little ai character you had to advance pretty far to change it (and the same with fast travel, it sort of existed and was a surprisingly cool unique system but you had to get through a lot of the game for it). I’d compare it in a lot of ways to the first dark souls as far as not following gaming industry trends.

I was hoping dragons dogma 2 was more of the same honestly, I don’t think I care if travel stones can be purchased or whatever. Is it a bad game for those that liked the first one?

I wonder how many of those critically acclaimed reviews are going to be Rewritten. Certainly you'd have to be a completely lacking Integrity not to realize you were Bamboozled when you're giving a different product than the public is to review.

Saw this game on PS5 and was about to get it when I saw all the "packs" and other bull shit. Noped right out.

It sucks that micro transactions exist at all, but I've been playing the game and haven't even opened the store at all, and the game seems pretty good. Is there any actual negativity on the actual game play, or is all the negativity sorry about the micro transactions? Because if that's the only drawback, then that's not really that bad.

I've got 15 hours in it and have played all weekend.

There are some performance issues, but overall, I've had a blast playing it.

All of the game content is accessible for the sticker price you paid, so yeah, I couldn't care less about the microtransaction aspect of things.