You're viewing a single thread.
I think I would prefer a simple nipple piercing pasta portioner, cause I always have a hard time figuring out how much to cook.
100 grams per person is the standard I grew up with, now I do 75.
I eat like 150g + 100g minced pork yet I can never climb out of underweight bmi like even if I tried hard and I think I did try many times
After all it became a feature not a bug cause I can stuff myself with anything, 175g beef burgers with fried sweet potatoes and nothing changes with my weight. I hope it stays like this forever
On the other hand sometimes I forget about food all together until 5 PM because I have been hyper focused on something for hours and often I treat food like a sims bar that has to be filled and a distraction unless I really crave something
I don’t understand snacks like give me some beef instead. I want meat, chicken you know, mmm fried chicken
The problem with low bmi is flat chest and I seriously gonna have to get some implants I think to feel better about that
True. I think it depends if pasta is the main or just a side dish. But weighing spaghetti on a scale is pretty cumbersome.
I'm just imagining the infomercial of some guy knocking the plate off the scale and then spaghetti is all over the floor saying there's got to be a better way and then another guy comes up, and rips off his shirt to reveal his spaghetti portoner nipple ring.
That being cumbersome sounds weird to me, but it's probably due to me always having a scale with a bowl at the ready, so it might be different for others
I just take half the box and boil that, eat half of that, then eat the other half the next day
Not a fan of reheating pasta when it's so easy to make a fresh batch tbh
I'm a single guy. I'm not cooking dinner for 1 two nights in a row.
I am one too, but I do like cooking. And I also definitely have nights when I can't be arsed to put anything together so I get your point
And those are the night for beans n tuna.