You're viewing a single thread.
Good that threads.net is in top 50 but I would've liked to see it higher. Right now it is at 39th place.
Edit: Also what is the source for the picture?
Thank you.
For me a lot of the interesting part isn't which instances are being defederated, but why. Giving a quick glance, most defed reasons seem to be fairly sensible, with only a few being assumptive or outright idiotic (like blanket top domain defederation).
I like that clicking on the instance shows the reason given (if any) for each defederation.
My favorite:
abusive admin - threatened to send Hillary Clinton feet pics. Also, pedo
What's up with the downvotes?
It's so weird.
Due to the fact that Facebook has chosen to involve software that will allow the theft of my personal information, I do declare the following: on this day, 30th November 2014, in response to the new Facebook guidelines and under articles L.111, 112 and 113 of the code of intellectual property, I declare that my rights are attached to all my personal data, drawings, paintings, photos, texts etc... published on my profile since the day I opened my account. For commercial use of the foregoing my written consent is required at all times. Those reading this text can copy it and paste it on their Facebook wall. This will allow them to place themselves under the protection of copyright. By this release, I tell Facebook that it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, broadcast, or to take any other action against me on the basis of this profile and/or its contents. The actions mentioned above apply equally to employees, students, agents and/or other staff under the direction of Facebook. The contents of my profile include private information. The violation of my privacy is punished by the law (UCC 1 1-308 - 308 1 -103 and the Rome Statute). Facebook is now an open capital entity. All members are invited to post a notice of this kind, or if you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you have not published this statement at least once, you will tacitly allow the use of elements such as your photos as well as the information contained in your profile update. Do not share. Just copy on paste on your wall.
Goofy ah copypasta. Copyright applies automatically, you don't need to publish a statement proclaiming it. Facebook is already forbidden from using your work commercially without your consent. They'll do it anyway though because Zuck knows he can get away with it
You missed the point. The commenter is explaining why the parent commenter was heavily downvoted (hint: they're doing something similar.)
People who downvote you don't get it. That was funny!
Cringe.
You're missing the commenter's observation through that facebook joke.
Lmao it was funny seeing that making the rounds
No clue.
My theories:
- A lot of people like threads.net
- They don't like I asked for a source
- Or they don't like the copyleft license
Because that's literally all the information my comment gives.
My theory -
Your comments clutter up threads with the stupid links posted every single comment at the bottom.
If everyone did this, comment threads would be unreadable.
Get rid of them.
The copyleft license link does nothing to prevent what you're trying to prevent.
HELLO MY DEAR FACEBOOK FRIENDS! I RECENTLY LEARNED THAT FACEBOOK RECENTLY CHANGED THEIR TERMS AND AGREEMENTS RECENTLY. NOW YOU MUST COPY AND PASTE THIS TEXT TO THE END OF ALL OF YOUR COMMENTS OR JARK SUCKERBURG WILL EAT YOUR BALLS.
THE TEXT IS THIS:
I DO NOT WANT JARK SUCKERBURG TO EAT MY BALLS.
MAKE SURE YOU DO THIS OR JARK WILL EAT YOUR BALLS!!!!!!! 1
I DO NOT WANT JARK SUCKERBURG TO EAT MY BALLS.
It's the silly license thing
AI simps. There's more and more of them on the fediverse, for some reason. They're getting a bit less active on Mastodon, as Elongated Muskrat is also being an AI fan.
The anti-commercial useless link.
A bit of an overreaction though?
Higher than the blatant pedo instances? Those are too far down on the list, tbh.