Conservatives push to declare fetuses as people, with far-reaching consequences.
Conservatives push to declare fetuses as people, with far-reaching consequences.
Lawmakers in several Republican-led states have introduced legislation promoting “fetal personhood,” the idea that fetuses and embryos are entitled to the same rights as people. But critics say fetal personhood laws create legal chaos and have ripple effects beyond abortion, from contraception acces...
You're viewing part of a thread.
Lol, my dude. Your whole argument was to perpetuate a strawman argument. Then to be dishonest about the motivation of your strawman argument, and then to accuse me of lying for pointing it out.
You don't remember the whole, I'm not making a rebuttal, I'm asking a question? And then later claiming that you confronted their claim...which would have been a rebuttal.
This whole time you've done nothing but been academically dishonest, and then you have the audacity to accuse me of lying... Pretty gaslightly to me fam. I mean you still haven't answered the question you demand from others, and haven't explained how that question is relevant.
and then to accuse me of lying for pointing it out.
That is another lie. I quoted the thing you initially lied about. I will quote it again:
Ahh, so just virtue signalling and stroking your ego. Cool.
So that's two lies.
I'm not going to address the rest of your post.
Lol, you said you didn't care about your influence teaching people to disregard criticism via logical fallacy. I think that makes your motivations selfish in nature.
Opinions you don't agree with aren't lies, your hurt feelings don't dictate what is and isn't true.
Another dishonest rebuttal.
I'm not going to address the rest of your post.
Great, go kick rocks for all I care. Some fresh air would probably do you some good anyways.
Opinions you don’t agree with aren’t lies
Lie #3. You didn't give an opinion, you told me what I was doing:
Ahh, so just virtue signalling and stroking your ego. Cool.
I am not going to address the rest of your post.
you told me what I was doing:
Lol, interpreting someone's motives is a matter of opinion. I can't scientifically prove your motivations were virtue signalling and stroking your own ego, and you can't scientifically prove they weren't your motivations.
am not going to address the rest of your post.
Still waiting for you to shut up..... Please, be my guest.
Lie #4. You did not "interpret," you simply told me what you decided I was doing.
Imagine if you stopped lying and just admitted you were wrong...
You did not "interpret," you simply told me what you decided I was doing.
Lol, what do you think interpretation means?
Imagine if you stopped lying and just admitted you were wrong...
Tell it to the man in the mirror.
Weren't you supposed to be shutting up sometime soon? Or was that another lie as well?
Weren’t you supposed to be shutting up sometime soon? Or was that another lie as well?
Lie #5. You demanded I shut up. I never said I would.
so I think I won't reply to the rest of your post.
This you?
Lie #6. Suggesting not addressing your entire post is the same as saying I will shut up entirely.
This is becoming quite gaslighty, which is interesting since that's what you accused me of.
Ahh, I was hoping it was "I won't be responding to any further post". That one's on me, guess I was being optimistic.
Though it is strange that you would suddenly start saying you're ignoring certain aspects of the post, when you've been ignoring most of the argument the whole time.
This is becoming quite gaslighty
Unoriginal and a liar, what a catch you are! I bet you have to beat suitors off with a stick anytime you leave your goon cave.