You're viewing a single thread.
Ive seen this exact joke with another monster
56 0 ReplyCongrats, you've just discovered internet memes.
22 0 ReplyBut this one make more sense because Tanith keeps her word and goes from "would" to "did"
16 0 ReplyDoes that count if it was before she had a hongri snek boi she was fattening up to have as a pre-made sausage?
5 0 Reply
Same. Yet another internet comic just blatantly stealing from another one.
11 0 Replyit's a reference to elden ring. That's Tanith and Rickard/the serpent.
32 0 ReplyAnd the original comic was about A biblically accurate angel. They just ripped it off. I posted it elsewhere in this thread.
13 0 ReplyI'd say it's more of a parody/homage, although since the original isn't well-known it needs to be presented along with this one.
21 0 Replythe original isn't well known
This comic got called out immediately by multiple people
4 0 ReplyBut it was called a "rip-off" when it was clearly parodying the original.
7 0 ReplyThat doesn't mean the original isn't well know, just that people often take the worst possible angle.
1 0 Reply
No you haven't...
2 0 Reply
Idk if either of you are aware of this but sometimes, two different people, who have never interacted in any way, can come up with the same idea.
In a world with 8 billion people it's hard to have an original thought and even harder to put that thought out before someone else does.
21 0 ReplyIt's word for word the same comic and the same angles and everything. Stop trying to be a smart-ass if you don't know what you're talking about.
47 0 ReplyIs this the original? Having the "monster" be an angel and labeling the person "monster fucker" makes it actually make sense to me.
11 0 ReplyYep. This comic even has its own know your meme page
14 0 ReplyHarsh to call this a "rip-off", then.
6 0 Reply... because it's obviously ripping it off?
4 0 ReplyA rip-off is something that is copying something else while pretending to be original. This is parodying the original.
6 0 ReplyHow can it be a parody if the original isn't well known?
2 0 ReplyBecause it was clearly known to the artist. This comic doesn't even make sense unless you know both the original and that these are Elden Ring characters.
4 0 Reply
10 0 ReplyI still don't get the ,,would".
8 0 ReplyIn the OP's comic, it certainly takes longer to figure "would what?"
The original above with the angel has "monster fucker" on the person, so it's a bit easier to deduce, "would fuck"
14 0 ReplyOh. Yeah. But why afraid?
1 0 ReplyThe dragon (and the angel) doesn't want to be seen as someone that a silly human would want to fuck, so it's "you're supposed to be afraid enough of me that you won't want to have sex with me"
1 0 Reply
Would have sex
10 0 ReplyKind of a meme to say that when you are looking at someone you would fuck
2 0 Reply
He's setting expectations appropriately with that shirt, what more do you want?
3 0 Reply
That's not what happens when people use the same word bubbles or images and change them.
8 0 Reply
Meta
1 0 ReplyMeta is self-reference, not just any reference
2 0 Reply