Skip Navigation

You're viewing a single thread.

33 comments
  • Bit of a red herring to put GDPR in the title when the article is about Lemmy missing key admin functions, and only tangentially how this runs afoul of GDPR.

    TL;DR Lemmy hasn’t implemented image deletion for users or admins, so don’t upload your government ID.

    • Bit of a red herring to put GDPR in the title when the article is about Lemmy missing key admin functions, and only tangentially how this runs afoul of GDPR.

      I haven't read the GDPR, yet, but it's still a serious issue – GDPR or not. Imagine if Instagram did that. Everybody would seriously go bonkers and rightfully so.

      System administrators often aren't software developers. Lemmy users need to trust Lemmy admins and Lemmy admins need to trust Lemmy developers. Maybe not letting users delete any uploaded media isn't outright illegal, maybe it is. I'm in the camp of it being definitively not cool.

      • Inflicting lawyers on an open source project is a great way to drive off the developers.

        If I hear Lemmy has a GDPR problem I assume it’s lawyer BS only European instance admins have to worry about.

        If I hear Lemmy has bugs in basic CRUD functionality, that’s a real issue.

        • If I hear Lemmy has bugs in basic CRUD functionality, that’s a real issue.

          Coincidentally I saw bug reports by that person and another person earlier that day (before the blog post was published), including one opened months ago with absolutely no reaction at all of even acknowledging that this is even an issue: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3973

          I've heard from time to time that Lemmy developers can be difficult to work with (I never worked with them, so I make it clear that this is hearsay) but I have the suspicion that there is some merit to that.

    • Aren't the key admin functions missing leading to GDPR non compliance?

33 comments