Moderna’s mRNA cancer vaccine works even better than thought
Moderna’s mRNA cancer vaccine works even better than thought
Adding Moderna’s mRNA cancer vaccine to a standard melanoma treatment dramatically reduces the risk of death or recurrence.
You're viewing a single thread.
This is amazing news for countries with free healthcare! Even though the vaccine is expensive, it's nowhere as expensive as the care a cancer patient needs today.
Plus you can send a healthy individual back to their families and into society again.
154 0 ReplyIdk man that sounds pretty communist to me
59 0 ReplyI know, right? It's almost like communism is a good idea or something.
16 0 ReplyYou and the person above you are confusing communism with socialism
2 0 Reply¿Por qué no los dos? I'm not confused.
3 0 Reply
It's not free, it's socialized. This means expenses are passed to the tax payers. But like you said, if it lowers costs long term, it's worth the short term cost increase.
38 0 ReplyTrue. My point is that when healthcare is socialised, the government will be the one having to budget the cost/benefit.
Meaning a cure will always be the most profitable, meaning we will see this for all citizens fast.
25 0 ReplyNot the most profitable... The least expensive, long term. The most profitable would be the cheapest option but the most possible tax is collected. The whole point is to reduce burden on the tax payers, not maximize tax revenue.
4 0 ReplyA healthy individual is more profitable, so as I said, a cure will be the best option - always.
And yes, it's profitable. No ones talking about maximising it and collecting more tax. But it's a great example on how Americans think.
10 0 ReplySo you are arguing the govt should run a profitable business?
2 0 ReplyAre you struggling with reading comprehension or just being purposely obtuse?
7 0 Reply
Plus you can send a healthy individual back to
their families and into societywork again.This is how the US will use this.
14 0 ReplyAnd everywhere else let's be honest....
4 0 ReplyTrue, except the US doesn't even do that. It's your fault for getting cancer, so you pay yourself. :))
4 0 ReplyLol everywhere. Ever been outside your country?
1 0 Reply
The shareholders of the pharma-industry will not be happy. You have to manage a disease, not heal it; that would be detrimental for the balance sheet.
And unhappy shareholders of big pharma is definitely not what we want; if they are happy, we will be happy.
10 0 ReplyPharma employees are famously not people who themselves or whose loved ones can also be affected by cancer...
The reason your healthcare sucks in the us is the insurance industry mate...
21 0 ReplyRight, we certainly can't have more than one factor.
2 0 Reply
Worst take on Lemmy in 2024, already calling it now.
14 0 Replycould have been an attempt at irony
3 0 Reply
They'll have to fight the shareholders of the health insurance industry, who don't want to pay for a long-term condition
1 0 Reply