It's a slightly click-baity title, but as we're still generating more content for our magazines, this one included, why not?
My Sci-fi unpopular opinion is that 2001: A Space Odyssey is nothing but pretentious, LSD fueled nonsense. I've tried watching it multiple times and each time I have absolutely no patience for the pointless little scenes which contain little to no depth or meaningful plot, all coalescing towards that 15 minute "journey" through space and series of hallucinations or whatever that are supposed to be deep, shake you to your foundations, and make you re-think the whole human condition.
But it doesn't. Because it's just pretentious, LSD fueled nonsense. Planet of the Apes was released in the same year and is, on every level, a better Sci-fi movie. It offers mystery, a consistent and engaging plot, relatable characters you actually care about, and asks a lot more questions about the world and our place in it.
Teleporters kill you and clone you. The person walking out of the teleporter may look like you and have your memories, but you are dead and that is a clone.
The process is likely incredibly painful, but because the memories of the clone are copied from just before the process started no one actually knows.
Heh. I just mentioned this one in another comment in this thread a short distance further up.
My response to this philosophy is... so? The end result is the same, it makes no difference to me.
Though we do know for a fact that it isn't painful, there was an episode where we saw Barkley go through a very slow transport sequence and he was aware through the process. He was nervous but not in pain.
If it's an exact copy then it's just a break in consciousness and it follows logically that there's no way to tell that the you that woke up is the you that went to sleep. Obviously a thought experiment since there's no such thing and it would depend on whichever imaginary teleportation technology. I don't agree with you so I'm gonna agree it's unpopular (ha!), congrats!