No tritium found in fish one month after Fukushima water release
No tritium found in fish one month after Fukushima water release
Tritium was not detected in the latest sample of two olive flounders caught Sept. 24, the Fisheries Agency said.
No detectable amount of tritium has been found in fish samples taken from waters near the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant, where the discharge of treated radioactive water into the sea began a month ago, the government said Monday.
Tritium was not detected in the latest sample of two olive flounders caught Sunday, the Fisheries Agency said on its website. The agency has provided almost daily updates since the start of the water release, in a bid to dispel harmful rumors both domestically and internationally about its environmental impact.
The results of the first collected samples were published Aug. 9, before the discharge of treated water from the complex commenced on Aug. 24. The water had been used to cool melted nuclear fuel at the plant but has undergone a treatment process that removes most radionuclides except tritium.
You're viewing a single thread.
For people genuinely interested in the nuclear industry, only listening to the cheerleaders and Dunning-Kruger advocates is a bad idea.
Go look at nuclear from extraction of materials, to refining of materials, plant risks and histories of disasters, waste and waste management issues,extraction. (ie There are superfunds sites in Washington state still being cleaned up from WWII bombing materials exteaction.)
Pro nuke shills normally like to just cherry pick a slice of the nuclear energy life cycle to fit confirmation bias and or intentionally do it in bad faith.
Yes Nuclear has a LOT of positive potential, but it's also got significantly higher risks (many magnitudes larger) as the history of disasters, exteaction, and waste management will show you.
This article like a lot of the comments are just pro nuke propaganda. None of these guys have empirical studies on the propagation rate of contamination through the food web for constant regular radioactive dumping. They don't have exhaustive studies on all the vectors by which the contaminates enter the food chain. There has not been nearly enough time since they started dumping to make the assertions being made here, and NO--64 fish is not a large enough sample size.... and on and on.
What you're reading here is wishful thinking and either inentional lies, or people who think they know more than they do demonstrating Dunning-Kruger.
Wtf you're just stating facts and giving a different opinion, and you're being downvoted for that. Truly i don't understand
They're claiming that some "exteaction" [sic] was done improperly during World War II when getting bomb material, and made a mess, and that that should be factored into the environmental effects of modern nuclear power.
That's a dumb argument.
Also telling people to go look it up, is not stating facts.
Reading comprehension, man, you totally missed the point. Also, the WWII superfunds sites in Washington state were just an example... pick any of the 500+ toxic uranium mines all over and around Navajo land if you prefer. Or any other mines in the US or otherwise.
The actual point of the comment was the disinformation, lies of omission, and ridiculous cheerleaders going on in this thread.
The no tritium found in a tiny sample of fish a little bit after starting to release contaminated water into the ocean presented with a ridiculous implication that it means everything is fine and there's nothing to worry about. Which you can see is what all the little fanbois here picked up and ran with... even though they're wrong for reasons I've already stated.
I tell people to look it up because it's not hard to find information, and nobody wants to just trust someone (read me) on the internet.
Honestly, if you need to be spoonfed links and papers chances are you're just looking to argue, 8gnore, discount, and not learn.
Here's an epa article on the 500+ (yes FIVE HUNDRED)mines the EPA been trying to remediate and deal with that were operational and poisoning the Najavo nation as late as 1986. At least half of them haven't been addressed at all and the ones that have are usually mitigation not solutions.
https://www.epa.gov/navajo-nation-uranium-cleanup/abandoned-mines-cleanup
I don't really believe you want to learn or are open to facts so I'm going to stop wasting my time.