People who work from home all the time ‘cut emissions by 54%’ against those in office
People who work from home all the time ‘cut emissions by 54%’ against those in office
Study in US shows one day a week of remote working cuts emissions by just 2% but two or four days lowers them by up to 29%

You're viewing a single thread.
I find this quite surprising. When I’m working from home during the winter, I’m heating a lot of the house that would normally be unheated.
I would have assumed that bringing multiple people together into a single heated space would have been more energy efficient
2 0 ReplyThere's so many other things to consider, including e.g. traffic
10 0 ReplyYes, of course. But I’m calling out the one factor that they specifically talk about
1 0 ReplyWhat's more efficient? Heating a small home that id well insulated and geared towards economical energy use or heating massive empty spaces of a practically non-insulated office building with massive heaters while at the same times the homes are being heated? (Albeit to a lower temperature)
6 0 ReplyThere’s a whole lot of assumptions there. Anyway, the report says I’m wrong.
3 0 Reply
This is based in the US. I imagine a lot of that also comes from air con, very long commutes and other wasted office energy use.
10 0 ReplyFrom the article > The main causes of remote workers’ reduced emissions were less office energy use, as well as fewer emissions from a daily commute.
Again - I'm really surprised that net energy use is less for distributed workers (setting aside commmute energy use).
6 0 Reply
I imagine a lot of people have the air on for indoor animals while they go to the office.
8 0 Reply