Judge rules Trump illegally deployed the National Guard in California
Judge rules Trump illegally deployed the National Guard in California
A federal judge ruled that President Donald Trump acted illegally in deploying the National Guard to address protests in the Los Angeles area.
You're viewing a single thread.
It's already been paused on appeal.
https://bsky.app/profile/phillewis.bsky.social/post/3lrhj33wblk2r
The legal system is just not equipped to deal with the threat implied by Trump.
In the US it seems like judges are just another executive arm of the government anyway.
The few actual judges still considering the law just get perpetually paused with appeals and what have you.
At first I was like "this video is 6 years old, how could this possibly be relevant to this conversation?"
Then I watched the video and realized, "yep... same shit, different day." The conservative playbook hasn't changed a bit and Democrats keep falling for it.
I hate to say this, but you could go back 40 years and this would still be true. 6 years ago, TACO was still in office.
This world really is worth living in, but we have a lot of work to do.
Innuendo Studios becoming more prevalent, and more prescient.
Way too spot on. The video "How to Radicalize a Normie" should be mandatory study in middle school... Then high school, then every year thereafter.
So...just let him keep breaking the law until it reaches the Supreme Court? I thought they were supposed to pause his actions, pending appeal...not let him keep going.
just let him keep breaking the law until it reaches the Supreme Court?
Also after it reaches the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court has already ruled against him several times this year alone
That doesn’t mean he has to obey those rulings.
He did technically return Abrego Garcia, but then he filed some trumped-up charges against him.
So yea, even if they comply, they are only doing malice compliance.
The National Guard should release all arrested protesters, return to base and tell the Governor of California that they are "reporting for duty". If not, they are traitors (already before but then even more so).
Temporary order while they consider it. Could still go either way.