I've seen a lot of posts on Lemmy today arguing that Greta Thunberg is privileged, self-obsessed or self-promoting, that her actions are merely symbolic and useless, etc. I have to wonder whether these are part of a coordinated campaign. I hope we can all recognize someone who cares enough to put themselves in danger for the sake of others.
Greta literally risked her life for this. Israel killed ten people on the 2010 Gaza Freedom Flotilla. And Israel bombed the most recent one.
The comments about Greta doing this for self promotion are pure Zionist bots. It is the de-facto Zionist retort after illegally kidnapping Greta in international waters. And the statement has very clearly been communicated from the top down at the Israeli Hasbara department.
I can’t remember the exact quote from Herman Hesse but it’s something like, “A person cannot conceive a quality in another that they don’t also have within themselves.” The reason so many people question Greta’s motives is because they are inherently selfish and Greta’s altruism is impossible for them to understand. The only reason they’d do anything that appears to be heroic is for their own ego or self serving means.
I’ve seen a lot of posts on Lemmy today arguing that Greta Thunberg is privileged, self-obsessed or self-promoting, that her actions are merely symbolic and useless, etc.
Yeah, centrists hate anyone that makes their genocide look bad.
I take my time to request they explain their entire "argument" until they are so frustrated with their own inaccuracies they decide to stop commenting. Just had some fun with that yesterday. Make it clear to those who come after.
Almost. I'm not acting in bad faith and actually want to understand the viewpoint. This last time I was getting empty and irrelevant platidudes to my direct questions, and they didn't like me pointing that out. I've ended plenty of other conversations saying that we clearly have different opinions or values, but I understand better where they are coming from and thank them for explaining it to me.
Edit: I suppose I did sealion at least once back in high school. A girl snarkily asked me, "why are you wearing that?" And when I started to answer, she interrupted saying, "see, I don't really care." I told her that was too bad and she probably shouldn't have asked before following her until I was done with my extended history over my t-shirt.
Sone of us are older and take issue with how much attention she is drawing while not really organizing anything. She's a useful figurehead but there are people making her out to be akin to the American civil rights leaders of the past and she's not doing what they did in terms of grassroots organization. She's more Oprah, without the baggage she brings, than MLK.
She's neither the second coming of Christ nor is she a huckster. I think she's a sometimes media darling who does work herself but does not seem to be building a movement but rather shows up to be the face of it.
Not really, if you take some time you'll see she herself isn't going around and doing grunt work. A lot of money is also spent making you think she's effective at what sheis doing.
Im not saying she is doing nothing but there is a difference between what she is doing and what people who started up grassroots organizations did. If ypu look into her foundation they finance other groups and it is those people who are organizing.
Not really, if you take some time you'll see she herself isn't going around and doing grunt work. A lot of money is also spent making you think she's effective at what sheis doing.
You've been trained to be reflexively dismissive of what she does. This is to direct your thinking away from the specific cause at hand.
You can verify this by the number of words you've typed in order to crap on Greta, compared to the number of words you've typed about the Crimes Against Humanity in Gaza being committed by Israel.
You will behave identically the next time she speaks up on important issues.
For you, it will always be about Greta, which will reduce your will to focus on the crisis at hand.
You need significant psychological help as you are delusional. You do not know me nor have I taken a pro-Israel position.
Settle down, Sparky.
I'm pointing out the actual topic, which isn't Greta, and the fact that your sole axe to grind here is "Greta sux", as you've been trained.
Given that the IDF has killed aid workers, journalists, medical personnel, children, anyone they feel like, The entire crew of that ship was literally risking death, in order to break Israel's blockade of food and aid to Palestinians.
Your singular takeaway? Greta don't impress me much.
You're profoundly unhelpful in the upward march of humanity.
Someone commented how everyone who isn’t celebrating her is a bot and I explained a different take on that.You then proceeded to pretend you know what I think and why which is delusional as you do not know me at all.
This is an utterly false depiction of what happened, Mr. Eight Day Old Account. In my first comment to you, I quoted you directly, so that you could see exactly what I was calling you out for.
You then proceed to suggest that I am brainwashed and a bad person because I don’t share your exact views which seems intensely hypocritical.
Im not suggesting that you are brainwashed. I am telling you that you're brainwashed, and exactly what you've been trained to think and do.
You then you continued to behave exactly as I described.
The only thing that seems to be important to you, is to drive home the idea that "Greta ain't all that". As though you're following marching orders or talking points, Mr. Eight Day Old Account.
I explained why they are eelusional as they are professing that they believe they can read minds. That's not gaslighting unless you somehow perceive there is a relationship with someone you don't know. If they are doubting their sanity from a singular reply from an anonymous poster what would that suggest to you?
Netanyahu has been leading Israel for years and spent decades in the IDF. Do you need me to connect the dots for you?
Go look up what "gaslighting" means as you are using that term incorrectly.
You never condamned a single israeli crime all you do it to talk about a person you hate for weird reasons. You can go to an unpopularopinion community and trash her as much as you want
More like she feels like Occupy Wall Street all over again where the work being done is ineffective, it feels like it is all for social media, and "progressives" will bully you if you actually ask what was achieved.
Of course! I get it now! And even if she did do things perfectly, there were other people also doing things, she didn’t do it all by herself, so fuck her.
Huh? She's done nothing but organize grassroot movements and civil disobedience since she was 15? MLK was 28 when he helped form the SCLC, Greta is 22 - give her some credit.
She's being celebrated for being a significant activist IRL who isn't effective at all. It's Occupy Wall Street all over again where people get really mad when you actually start asking what the results of that action was.
Personally I don’t feel one can argue that she isn’t doing good but I do feel there is an argument to be had that the way she goes about it can do more harm than good and even border on immature. Especially given that the people who most need to hear her message are those who are most likely to ignore her due to her age and station.
I didn’t say I believe she is immature. I said I feel there is an argument to be had that the way she goes about doing things can do more harm than good and border on immature.
Again, I don’t think you actually read my comment. I literally said what she is doing is good and I don’t think people can argue against that but that I understood why people are pissed about how she is going about it. But if I you think I am a coward for speaking my mind then you need to rethink your priorities.
You’re not a coward for speaking your mind, you’re a coward for not taking a stance. You’re doing nothing and complaining about others doing something.
I am really not getting what is so hard to understand about what I said or why people in this thread really want to fight about it but I guess I’ll say it again;
I can see why people are pissed about how she goes about spreading an otherwise good message and I am willing to listen to them. I am not arguing either side.
Of course I refuse. Why would I engage with people who don’t get that I was responding to someone who was discounting others’ opinions because they disagree with them and then everyone did that to me?
I can understand what you're saying, but one side is irredeemably evil and the other wants the evil to stop. Equivocating between the two is support for the former.