What techniques do bad faith users use online to overwhelm other users in online discussion and arguments?
What techniques do bad faith users use online to overwhelm other users in online discussion and arguments?
I am aware of
- Sea-lioning
- Gaslighting
- Gish-Galloping
- Dogpiling
I want to know I theres any others I'm not aware of
You're viewing a single thread.
I see ad hominem very often as well as strawmanning. Specifically on lemmy people will say tankie/auth or irl they'll say woke/liberal and then use those insults to further strawman argumenents. Specifically multiple times I have said "hey I voted Kamala but her policies deeply concern me", and people responded with "Uhh how dare you not vote Kamala and openly declare you hate democracy, freedom, and trans people".
I often get the feeling those people see everyone who voices dissent as one big amorphous blob. It's as if every conversation on a topic is part of one long argument, and you get assigned every claim that anyone ever made. Almost like they watched that "moops" alt-right playbook video and drew the exact wrong conclusion.
Yup, every time I talk about workers libertarian they say "uhh but what about china, haha no food". Ignoring the fact that most of their claims are garbage simply being a leftist has caused people to drag me with every leftist ideology and person to ever exist.
The other way happens as well. You can say you voted harris because its the lesser of 2 evils, then someone calls you genocider... 🤦♂️
Like, people forget how FPTP systems work.
I've been called a harris voting genocider a couple times now. I'm Australian.
Or I can say that I voted Kamala and I still hate that she supported genocide and get called a tankie.