You're viewing a single thread.
211
comments
Anyone got a link to the motion? Surely it's a public record, right? This is interesting if true, but I'd like to check the sources.
Sorry if I missed it in the rest of the comments; I scanned them and didn't see it.
Thank you!
Pages numbered 23 to 26 are the meat of the argument referenced in the image, for anyone else that wants to click through.
"[[l]t can hardly be said that the officer in this case followed the policy [for an inventory search] by conducting a search that included only the glove compartment, and upon finding a gun, leaving it in place."
211
comments