Why disable ssh login with root on a server if I only log in with keys, not password?
Why disable ssh login with root on a server if I only log in with keys, not password?
On a server I have a public key auth only for root account. Is there any point of logging in with a different account?
You're viewing part of a thread.
Simple solution is to not use sudo.
Sorta like Slackware's default.And what do you suggest to use otherwise to maintain a server? I am not aware of a solution that would help here? As an attacker you could easily alias any command or even start a modified shell that logs ever keystroke and simulates the default bash/zsh or whatever.
$ su -
And how would you not be able to hijack the password when you have control over the user session?
You would have to know the root password.
With aliases in the bashrc you can hijack any command and execute instead of the command any arbitrary commands. So the command can be extracted, as already stated above, this is not a weakness of sudo but a general one.
You would have to KNOW the root password.
No you can alias that command and hijack the password promt via bashrc and then you have the root password as soon as the user enters it.
No, that's not how it works.
You really should stop talking shit about things you know nothing about.
Truly sad.As root:
# chattr +i /home/ShortN0te/.bashrcAnything else?
There are many ways to harden against it, but "just disable root auth" is not really it, since it in itself does not add much.
So, you learned about .bashrc today, and you're now an expert?
Perhaps stand down and let the experts have their say.??
Seriously - if you're "advising" on linux best practices, get lots of liability insurance.
Nah just set up PAM to use TOTP or a third party MFA service to send a push to your phone for sudo privs.
...and if you don't have your phone attached to your hand...?
I...I don't understand the question.
Also, yubikey or any other token. Plenty of MFA options compatible with sudo.
Then you can’t gain root privileges on your server. Are you really arguing for less security because it’s inconvenient?
This is end-user behavior and it’s honestly embarrassing. You should realize your security posture is much more important than “I left my phone on the other room”
This thread is embarrassing,
The person you're responding to could wipe your ass with a cli.ffs...am I dealing with children here?
You've accessed your server as a user, and then you su - to root.
You don't need a phone or a yubi or a dreamcatcher, or a unicorn.
Please stop with your pretension.
You're so far out of your league that it's embarrassing to me that I've bothered to answer.There must at least be MFA somewhere on the path then.
Even just keys, I wouldn't trust, unless they are stored on smartcards or some other physical "something I have", require a PIN/passphrase. and centrally managed so they can be revoked and rotated. Too many people use unprotected SSH keys.