You're viewing a single thread.
BUT WHAT ABOUT GENOCIDE JOE!?! KAMALA IS BAD! TRUNP WILL FIX EVERYTHING!
/s
This kind of take is a tired meme at this point.
No one said this.
Wat? Pretty much everybody said this.
Who on Lemmy was saying, "Trump will fix everything?" Where?
There were a few bots posting shit takes like that, like Ozma, but it isn't something you see often over here.
I very occasionally saw something like that, and it generally didn't get upvoted at all and was criticized by both sides.
You can literally browse my comment history and see that many many people said this to me.
No, they didn't. If it's that easy, provide a link.
This is in my comment history and although the mod has removed the comments from the other person you can easily infer what they’re saying from what I’m replying. You could also use the mod log to recover those comments.
This will also give you a head start to browse my comments in the same time period as it was post election.
Not that I should have to do this for you, you should want to seek truth and not just shrug things off. Also, it would be nice to be a little more polite.
you can easily infer what they’re saying from what I’m replying.
Lol. I know your side, you are all too happy to equate criticizism of your candidate with an endorsement of the other side. If I was going to take your word for it, I wouldn't have challenged the claim in the first place.
When I searched the modlog for "jailgenociders," guess what I found? "Trump belongs in jail." "sadnonyank" says, "You're no better than a maga idiot, you just don't realize you're a fascist too."
So you were lying. Who could've predicted?
Idk why y'all lie all the time, it's so easy to check and expose it. I guess you're just used to people not checking so you get away with it.
Dude you sound insane.
I’m not lying and I’ve said numerous times that the comments are there.
Can you share the screenshots of mod log you checked that corresponds to the thread I linked? I most likely won’t reply tonight as I’m in bed now but I’ll happily continue tomorrow once you’ve shared what you found.
Thanks. Have a nice evening.
Lol. So that's your counter to being checked and proven objectively wrong, just accuse me of "sounding insane" because I did the homework.
No, I won't share screenshots from the modlog, as posting removed content generally goes against the rules. You can check the same way I did, as can anyone reading.
I forgot that I actually asked a question about it so here a whole thread where you can quite easily see people saying it.
Skimmed, didn't see it. It's >500 comments so you'll have to be more specific. It's a nice tactic to point to an enormous wall of text and asserting the evidence is somewhere inside, leaving it to me to prove a negative.
Let’s just end it here hey.
I don’t have the patience or energy right now.
If you don’t believe that people were saying that Biden/Trump/Harris would all be equally as bad for Palestine then I don’t know what to tell you.
It’s really doesn’t matter and as I said earlier. Take care and have a nice evening.
What an amazing exercise in deflection!
Let’s just end it here hey.
Conveniently, right after you were proven wrong.
If you don’t believe that people were saying that Biden/Trump/Harris would all be equally as bad for Palestine then I don’t know what to tell you.
That's not what the claim was. After being proven wrong, you're trying to pretend we were talking about something completely different.
The claim in question was, "Trump will fix everything." You can't produce that, you're full of shit, and you were called on it.
But sure, we can end it here. I've proven my point and you will never admit it so there's nothing more to say.
You are technically correct, in a way that would make Hermes Conrad blush. It is true, that nobody said "Trump will fix everything." itsonlygeorge didn't say that anyone literally said that exact phrase. It's an exaggeration of the actual verbal abuse we've been subject to for the last year or so.
I wonder if your standard works both ways. If I characterized your side as saying, "I voted for Kamala because I love watching Israel kill babies," and then was completely incapable of providing evidence that anyone saying anything like that, would you say that I was only "technically [in]correct, in a way that would make Hermes Conrad blush?" I doubt it.
Sure, it would be incorrect to totally mischaracterized Harris voters as "[loving] watching Israel kill babies." That's not really analogous to itsonlygeorge's comment, since our whole argument has been 'Trump will let Israel kill more babies, so we should stop him however we can' and the anti-electoralists' whole argument has been 'both candidates will let Israel kill babies, so it's better to let the greater evil win than vote for the lesser evil'
Like, you guys got what you want. Harris lost, just like you wanted.
Right, as expected, you're perfectly fine with flimsy strawmen so long as they're targeting our side and not yours, very blatant double standard.
There are no sides anymore. Just fascists. You know who loses? We the people. The rich oligopolists win.
Lol. You say that now after accusing people like me of being pro-Trump.
Punches someone in the face "Woah woah, let's not get crazy or anything, we're all friends here, let's just all calm down."