You're viewing a single thread.
I just love how literary no one involved even acknowledged the existence of Threads lmfao.
122 0 ReplyLiterary or literally? (hint: neither are correct.)
29 0 Replyliterally is objectively correct in this context
63 0 ReplyLiteraryly
25 0 ReplyThe latter is correct, no?
12 0 ReplyIn the secondary, new-age definition of "literally" yes that's true.
We lost the war for "literally". It's now just an emphasis word. The definition is mind bending:
1)in a literal manner or sense; exactly.
2)informal; used for emphasis or to express strong feeling while not being literally true.
On the bright side less people use "absolutely" incorrectly than before.
1 0 ReplySure, but where in the image do you see someone acknowledge the existence of Threads?
1 0 Reply
I used to see people having some sort of threads number on their instagram profile, now sometimes i forget that even exists lol
14 0 ReplyIt's the same number on every Instagram profile
1 0 Reply
i haven't heard of anyone actually using it, but I've heard of people using the others
7 0 Reply... MILF Messenger?
9 0 Reply
you did 🙀
3 0 Reply