Mazda's New "Pay-Per-Honk" Plan Leaves Drivers Speechless
Mazda's New "Pay-Per-Honk" Plan Leaves Drivers Speechless
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/20824402
Automaker's latest subscription model takes nickel-and-diming to new heights
You're viewing a single thread.
This is satirical. In a world where we have plenty of problems with cars, we don't need to make them up.
23 0 ReplyThis would be an improvement with cars, not a problem with cars.
4 0 ReplyDisagree. Horns are the only way of letting people you are there. Why the hell should I need to pay to honk? You want to be forced to pay to honk when some dude tries Tboning you because they didn't stop at a stop sign?
8 0 ReplyBecause, more often than not it's used abusively and not for the actual purpose.
Plus it's a polluting loud noise that puts the onus of recognizing the danger of the vehicle on someone outside of it
4 0 ReplyNot sure where you live, but I've avoided numerous accidents thanks to being able to give a light honk and remind people to pay attention.
If a car made me pay to honk, id probably just use the money to get a train horn.
4 0 ReplyBut what about braking?
I do support the train horn idea though, I've always wanted one for my bike
1 0 ReplyBraking is great, if you have 100+feet to brake, depending on where and how it happened, sure!
For the very few times I need a horn, I NEED a horn.
Also again, not sure where you live, but it feels like I'm the only person who uses my horn in my state, which is likely why its so damn effective.
3 0 Replybraking and honking do not always apply to the same situations. both are necessary safety features that should absolutely not cost extra.
1 0 Reply