Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TH
Posts
0
Comments
69
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Because I have the right to get a manufacturer that is not liable. Much like my ability to get a car is based on the fact that auto manufacturers not liable My ability to get a gun is absolutely reliant upon gun manufacturers not being liable.

    You are not participating in a good faith discussion if you don't acknowledge that making guns manufacturers liable will remove my choice to shoot paper.

    You're proposal will affect me, at least if you're arguing in good faith.

  • I use guns to shoot paper. Your argument for what guns are created for is flawed. My gun is not created for the ending of human lives.

    My gun was made to end paper from being completely without holes.

    Are you saying that my use of the gun is wrong? Or am I allowed to have a gun that is not used for killing?

    -Signed a bleeding heart lefty with a gun

  • I agree we need help now. There's a reason it comes so far in the future and all of them are artificial.

    If we really wanted to we could build safe nuclear tomorrow. Okay that's a bit of an exaggeration but you know what I mean.

  • In my opinion clean is anything that doesn't emit out of smokestacks.

    Also in this case it doesn't emit out of smoke stacks while the sun's down and the wind's not blowing.

    Dams are terrible for the environment so hydro is out. Nuclear is cleaner than hydro.

  • Well using inflation, if I have the phone for the two years at the end of the two years I'm paying back with money that's worth less.

    I personally don't do it but it is literally good value because you pay back with money that is worth less - future money