pixxelkick @ pixxelkick @lemmy.world

Posts

4

Comments

890

Joined

2 yr. ago

Reread what you wrote.

A 10 year old being able to walk home is not the same as that 10 year old also being responsible for a 7 year old

This isn't rocket science.

to not keeping your children on a leash for the entire 18 years they are minors

Hyperbole.

Theres, crazy as it sounds, a reasonable middle ground between:

1. letting your SEVEN YEAR OLD play UNSUPERVISED near a fucking FOUR LANE BUSY ROAD vs
2. Putting a leash on your teenager

The fact you had to reach for such insane hyperbole demonstrates how out to lunch you are. Yes, the woman was 100% legally negligent, its absolutely fucking insane to try and pretend letting a SEVEN YEAR OLD play with no adults around near a fucking busy ass four lane road. Are you genuinely insane?

God I hope you don't have kids, lol.

Interesting that you frame a parent losing their child in a tragic accident as “getting off scot free”

Because when you get one of your kids fucking killed due to negligence, you shouldn't be allowed to keep your other kids too. You have very clearly made it obvious you are not responsible enough to have any children in your care and CPS should take your kids away, and yes, you 100% should have legal action taken against you.

This has nothing to even do with cars, if parents in ANY way allow their child to die due to negligence in a way that would have been easily preventable if they had simply just fucking watched their damn kid, then they deserve to have their other kids taken away too.

That's super basic shit in any legal system. Doesn't matter how their kid died, they were exceedingly negligent here and fucked up super bad.

A 10 and 7 year old are not at all old enough to be allowed to wander around roads by themselves, thats extremely fucked up and indefensible. No sane parent would let their kids just wander off unsupervised in such a dangerous way.

This isn't some quiet little 1.5 lane street in the middle of a sleepy neighborhood, it was a fucking busy ass 4 lane road, thats insane to let your kids play around that unsupervised. The woman 100% deserves to be charges with negligence.

And if a 10 year old is perfectly capable of walking to school (literally according to everyone), a 7 year old with their 10 year old brother should also be perfectly fine walking TWO BLOCKS without the worry of being killed by a driver.

...No...

A 10 year old is not old enough to be responsible for a 7 year old, full stop. Most experts consider around 12 to 13 the minimum maturity for a child to be capable of being responsible for another child. 10 is definitely too young to be looking after another kid, wtf are you talking about.

I really hope you don't have kids...

I agree, well, at least car lanes.

Turn 2 of the lanes into bike lanes.

No one said otherwise.

Cars and roads sucking doesn't mean the mother's behavior is excused. Full stop.

You literally are acknowledging it's a death trap, and surely you must then agree that a parent who let's their children go play near the fucking death trap unsupervised is obviously being negligent.

You don't get to go "roads are death traps, and because they're death traps parents get off scott free if they let their children die to them"

No, in fact, it makes their behavior obviously worse because they should KNOW it was a bad idea

I never said stroads were good.

You understand two things can both be a problem at once right?

Stroads are indeed awful.

Letting your 7 year old go and play near one unsupervised is also very bad too

You don't get to just go "roads bad" and this excuses the mothers negligent behavior. Both can be bad, at the same time.

A history isn't needed, the child is seven years old, that's all that's needed.

Seven year olds are not nearly old enough to wander around 4 lane busy roads unsupervised, full stop.

That's blatant negligence, there's no getting past that.

It also was routine to beat your kids and get prescribed meth to take home, and give your kids alcohol and smokes

What sort of argument is this, times change as we learn things.

Supervising your fucking seven year old near a 4 lane road isnt helicopter parenting lol

... mate do you think this person did it intentionally?

I'm pretty confident this lemmy is overrun with bots spouting hallucinated LLM garbage.

Several posters here are citing shit not remotely true about this case, and somehow you all are just eating it up and upvoting them like crazy, clearly having not read the article yourselves or you'd realize how out to lunch the posts are.

Literally making up random facts that are extremely wrong. One talks about daughters, despite there being zero daughters mentioned, only sons. Others bringing up some random dude from 2011

And when called out they backpedal with more random garbage that doesn't even make sense.

Yall, you get the fact these are obviously bots, right? Read the fucking article and stop upvoting obviously wrong statements, what us wrong with you?

He's gonna live with the fact that some mom let her 7 year old run out into traffic... that's not exactly his fault. He's probably fuckin traumatized now because she was a terrible parent.

Let's start with maybe, I dunno, not letting 7 year old kids go out and play near 4 lane busy roads or something? Maybe supervise your fucking kids though?

Driver did nothing wrong, the kid jumped into the road, the fuck is he supposed to do there.

I dunno does your 7 year old jump out into oncoming traffic often? Cuz this kid did.

...I think you read a very different article, nothing you said matches the story of the article at all?

You just making shit up? Or are you just a bot hallucinating llm garbage?

Nothing you wrote matches the articles story at all, what in the disinformation bullshit is this.

Also why the fuck do you have thirteen up votes?

None of you idiots read the story and just upvoted this hallucinated garbage? What is wrong with people.

The kids weren't with their mom, the article doesn't mention time of day, it doesn't say a crosswalk was 1/3 of a mile away, they were unsupervised, THE DRIVER DIDNT SERVE ANY TIME AND ISNT CHARGED, THE DRIVER DIDNT TAKE OFF, THERE WAS NO DAUGHTER, IT WAS TWO BOYS...

Seriously people, what the fuck, why are you upvoting this blatant disinformation?

The internet really is dead huh?

... the... the unsupervised child ran into the street

The fuck you mean?

The driver didn't do a thing wrong, it's a busy 4 lane road, you aren't in the wrong if some random kid jumps onto the road in front of you.

I get that this is the FuckCars lemmy but give me a break, this is clearly a case of parents being negligent.

Don't let your fucking seven year old child go play unsupervised on 4 lane roads, that's not fuckin rocket science.

This was a problem before cars existed, parents in the 1600s were smart enough to not let their kids go play unsupervised under the hooves of horses too.

Cool

The paper clearly is about how a specific form of training on a model causes the outcome.

The article is actively disinformation then, it frames it as a user and not a scientific experiment, and it says it was Facebook llama model, but it wasn't.

It was a further altered model of llama that was further trained to do this

So, as I said, utter garbage journalism.

The actual title should be "Scientific study shows training a model based off user feedback can produce dangerous results"

Anytime an article posts shit like this but neglects to include the full context, it reminds me how bad journalism is today if you can even call it that

If I try, not even that hard, I can get gpt to state Hitler was a cool guy and was doing the right thing.

ChatGPT isn't anything in specific other than a token predictor, you can literally make it say anything you want if you know how, it's not hard.

So if you wrote an article about how "gpt said this" or "gpt said that" you better include the full context or I'll assume you are 100% bullshit

Sorts? Not tabs in the way you'd expect but it's default ones can be sufficient

Honestly though once you get pretty good with hotkeys you stop using tabs, for all intents and purposes harpoon is tabs, but better, and without the UI. You just mentally usually pick harpoon keys that make sense to save jump points to, like I'll harpoon FooController.cs to c and FooService.cs to s and FooEntity.cs to e and so one

And the I jump around with those keys. Usually when working I only need tops 5 harpoon or so for a chunk of work.

I still boot in sub 1s so I don't know what you mean by "bloated"

Lazy allows you to boot ultra fast by loading stuff in the background later, so "bloat" doesn't matter

nvim-dap does literally nothing until you trigger it, so it's only impact on my startup is like 3 hotkey registrations :p

It's a perfectly fine debugger, works great. The fact I can telescope search to fzf my stack trace actually kind of makes it superior? Like you can't do that sorta stuff in any other IDE I know of

Also all my navigation stuff like telescope/harpoon/etc still apply when debugging, so I can literally debug faster jumping around the stack trace with hotkeys.

Neovim doesn't get any less awesome when it comes to debugging, a lot of it's power still applies just as much haha

A lot of them are dependencies of other plugins.

Stuff like icons support, and every little feature. Neovim is extremely minimalist to start, so you need plugins just to get something as simple as a scrollbar lol

Things like git status of files and file lines, all your LSPs, syntax highlighting (for each language you work with), file explorer, you name it, there's a lot.

But what's nice about nvim is for any of these given features, there's numerous options to pick from. Theres probably a dozen options to choose from for what kind of scrollbar you want in your editor, as an example.

So you end up with a huge amount of plugins in the end, for all your custom stuff you have configured.

You have to setup yourself (though theres a lot of very solid copy pasteable recipes for each feature):

• Scrollbar
• Tabs(if you want em)
• bookmarking
• every LSP
• treesitter
• navigation (possibly multiple of them, I use both a file tree, telescope, and harpoon)
• file history stuff
• git integrations, including integrating it with the numerous other plugins you use (many of them can integrate with git for stuff like status icons)
• Code commenting/uncommenting
• Code comment tags (IE TODO/BUG/HACK/etc)
• your package manager is also a package (I like lazy for wicked fast open speeds, neovim opens in under 1s for me)
• hotkey management (I like to use which-key)
• prose plugins (lots of great options here too, I use nvim for more than just coding!)
• neorg, so I can use nvim for taking notes, scheduling stuff, etc too
• debugger via nvim-dap
• debugger UI via nvim-dap-ui
• lualine, which is a popular statusline plugin people like to have at the bottom of their IDE for general file info
• new-file-template which lets me create templates for new files by extension (IE when I make a .cs file and start editting it, I can pick from numerous templates I've made to start from, same for .ts, .lua, etc etc)
• git conflict, which can detect and work with detected git merge conflict sections in any type of file and give me hotkeys to do stuff like pick A / B / Both / Neither, that sorta stuff

The list goes on and on haha