Ok, Asian here and rice eater here also and I think the right way to respond to racist cliches is with hostility, same way we ought to respond to Nazism and other forms of fascism. if you want to reclaim the word, fine whatever. But you're drawing a false equivalence between westerners trying to self-criticize their use of chauvinistic language, and the imperial governments that enforce that chauvinism in the first place (wtf?)
Are you sure it's about killing the people of NATO member nations and not wanting to abolish the NATO organization?
Is the executive of the media company that owns the news outlet also a journalist? Is the financial conglomerate that owns the media company as well as the missile company, also a journalist? Come on, you must have thought at least once in your life about this actually existing hierarchy of capitals and how it influences what news gets published and who gets to work as a journalist.
Also Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq the first time and through the sanctions... You know, Ukraine... North Korea, the US government definitely tries to pull the wool over our eyes on that one. Venezuela, Cuba, on and on
They can't even spell it right, of course they never took the initiative to question the massacre narrative
Thank you, I thought of making a similar remark about blood pressure, lol
When the bit simulation is too good
Yeah that's whack, he could say he's the most racist US president since Andrew Johnson and that would make more sense
No u r the chatbot. In fact, everyone with a differing opinion from mine is a chatbot. Which means everyone, because even in the echo chamber like the one you want to inhabit there will be disagreements. In fact, pretty much everyone has at least one opinion that contradicts another, so by your logic, everyone is a chatbot! Including me oh shi 
Damn you owned us we've never seen that article before you posted it lmao 